Guess I came late to the party Erika, as I think the game isn’t perfect right, monetization is a thing with all games nowadays, but I got to admit I love it and have recommended alot of my planetside outfit check this out, I think focusing on the wrong things doesn’t help.
Monetization doesn’t help players aim, use tactics, it give them a weapon which can be countered in multiple ways…
you must be really new to see that the bed aspect are much bigger than the overhall game. right?
no, i’m not trying to be mean towards you, or the product.
but from a oobjective perspective, it’s becoming obvious how much pay to win this game tries to be.
i mean, you come from planet side, which it’s a great title. but if we have to take some comparison, i wouldn’t put a doubt on planetside any time soon. yes, it has some umbalance weapons, and others locked behind payment. weather are different game, the first game experience it’s totally different.
and above all, in planet side you are not stucked in the game where it almost forces you to pay in order to compete and archieve the same level of fire power as others. does it?
exept it preatty much doesn’t.
you must have skipped many threads about people complaining over prem squads as it gives laser weapons that complealty fucks balance, and super soldiers that can eat bullets or flinch at you when you try to kill them.
very historical accurate and balanced. yes?
Maybe as on Ps5 I don’t see them, as those are not in game, at least in Normandy… but I do go against Mg42, Breda LMG squads and have no issues.
I have read all the threads but sick of reading it listening to a broken record, they are not that big a deal, in my opinion.
have you at least tried moscow?
because doesn’t feels like. as a tester, you shouldn’t only stick with one campaign. you are not providing an accurate and usefull feedback i’m afraid.
and for people like me and you, that spended money and invested time for it, i do at least expect better from this title.
than how can you make your own opinion if you didn’t even tested the matter?.
and above all, if many people complains about it… perhaps it means that is actually truee and there are some problems?
don’t you think?
an example,
take a look at the comment below mine, made by @32883447 .
i think he explained pretty much everything.
Here, have a full list about what makes premium squads P2W and unbalanced. And for the record, because I see more and more people saying thet they don’t have problms with killing premiums - they are not unkillable and noone is saying that they are. But they provide unfair advantages, that F2P players will never get, even after completing the whole grind
*one note, chance to failure when upgrading a weapon was promised to be removed by devs, so the first point aged a bit
I have played moscow, I prefer Normandy, but have played it, I think the amount of grind it is very hard to play both campaigns, with a day job, kids every other…I have played both campaigns, but perhaps I was lucky and not to run into these op lmg squads lets see will go on today.
I run into Chachaut and MG30 squads sometimes and they die just like everyone else 
What’s that I’m talking about for months. It’s not that op and also premium squads doesn’t have engineers - its so weak without. But you will see now - heavy forum cavalry aproaching. I almost hear their footsteps.
This post was hard to understand.
Also I think you mean hoof steps. 
Exactly premium are specialized, but too specialized for their own good!
I bought all founders packs individually to show how much I love this game, all of them are in reserves, pioneer and antitank, assault infantry (?) are my squads right now…