Axis paratroopers in the new battles pass weapon replacement idea

Archive Suggestions - Archive
21

Fixed

1 Like
22

That is true, I was thinking the barrel assembly looked more like an M1 Carbine. But yeah they’re two separate rifles.

1 Like
23

If the German mains thought the M2 was bad as a progression weapon, they would be in tears about this.
The only possible downside could be recoil, but it could be mitigated by a good player.

1 Like
24

Nah that’s pushing it. At least the M2 carbine did see combat use. The T20 is an extremely rare prototype.

2 Likes
25

So are a ton of the soviet weapons and some of the German weapons…
If they added it as a progression weapon, I wouldn’t complain.

3 Likes
26

Like tons of gun already in the progression, really someone still complain for this?

27

The belt fed SMG had ONE single model made… we can get 4 in game. By that logic this can be flat out ignored on the grounds that enlisted gold order weapons can be gotten more then once.

28

Not necessary for the US, there’s more than enough weapons already. T20 could be a gold order.

That also wasn’t a complaint.

29

You missed the point entirely. The T20 doesn’t need to be added as a progression weapon because:

  1. It’s literally a BAR.
  2. There’s enough unique weapons in faction already.
30

Yes but the T20 could be equipped on all troops, whereas the BAR can only be equipped on MG gunners.

2 Likes
31

That’s a fair point and I can’t disagree with that.

1 Like
32

This is also a good point, it could be the STG counter in the long run.

2 Likes
33

In that respect I guess it’s a better counter to the FG 42s.

That said, I still stand firm in my opposition to allowing auto rifles on rifleman at all. It just gets messy.

34

I rather keep the FG42, thanks. The only thing i would change is

  1. one more mag for the fg
  2. MP40 instead of MG34 (many would disagree, but i like the mp40 way more and is actually an assault weapon)
35

Now that we have paras with FG-42s and the possibility for tech tree variants, maybe we can get rid of FG-42s on all other soldier types.

I’m sure that would go down real well

36

My only issue with it is that it can be equipped on every soldier. That’s the problem. And that goes for other auto rifles as well.

1 Like
37

I was being serious :slight_smile:

I think only Fallschirmjager squads should have it. (and there are plenty of those)

I would also look to move other auto rifles to a certain class, Like rangers or Guards units or something

But yeah, not popular and not likely

1 Like
38

Auto rifleman?

I don’t think it’s necessary, but I wouldn’t be bothered if they did do that. After all, it is a paratrooper weapon.

39

just nit picking, I love the game and have fun regardless. Just a few things I would do differently

like grey zone/map size, and class loadouts.

2 Likes
40

And fg 42 2 is so better than a bar

Therefore, developers will push such people against each other, and not against car98, mosin, springfield, arisaka rifle