- Yes, fix the armor profile discrepancies on the Matilda tank.
- No.
There’s an armor profile discrepancies going on the Matilda tank in Enlisted that needs fixing.
Specifically, wrong thickness on the front and side sections of armor that the Matilda tank in Enlisted has actually thinner armor than it supposed to have.
Yes, i’m assuming that the Enlisted got it wrong on the armor because the Warthunder has more up-to-date damage models on the vehicles and the sources i could find actually in-line with Warthunder’s armor profiles rather than Enlisted’s armor profiles.
Here are the comparisons between Enlisted Matilda 3’s armor and Warthunder Matilda 3’s armor :
seems like very minimal changes but sure, as long as it doesn’t render them unable to be killed by long or medium 50 for whatever reason.
Enlisted automaticlly calculates armor thickness to their relative protections against incoming shells.
f.e Cast Homogenous Armor has 0.94 mult x 75mm - > 75mm Cast in WT translate to 70.5mm Equivalent Protection. In Enlisted (As Enlisted automaticlly converts their value to actual armor protections)
9 Likes
Ah, that explains it. After checking up on the other tanks with CHA as well, i can confirm that this is indeed being a thing in Enlisted unlike in Warthunder.
Thanks for the answer and i guess this suggestion post can be closed since the premise was wrong from the get-go.
Closed as answered + OP Request
