APCBC with explosive filling for M6A2E1

c49c6d4948caeb4feabd84dce7654f16
c1177b1c8b464543fd3730b5fb6b204f

e8d596f65a6bce6e3df7d5d21e653371
f5e1a4fec5be3a04ba3c3061c337dd42
Currently, the M6A2E1 in-game is restricted to firing non-explosive APCBC rounds only, which is inappropriate for a tank rated at BR 5. This results in abysmal post-penetration damage. Additionally, its weak-spot red-ringed sections can be penetrated to detonate the ammo rack by the Tiger E, while the M6A2E1 suffers a lengthy 15-second reload. Granting it explosive-filled APCBC ammunition would better equip it to combat the King Tiger.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
3 Likes

it isnt even out yet :sob:

12 Likes

welcome to the allied forum experiance

3 Likes

So the T13 is still the best option


It’s undoubtedly America’s version of the IS-2.

Why does the tank look like it is badly photoshopped? It really look like one of FNFALs creation but somehow it is real…

2 Likes

After all, it uses a 100mm-thick T-1E1 hull topped with composite base armor of 140mm plus another 40mm. You can’t expect a 1943 vehicle to have all-around armor capable of stopping the King Tiger’s 88mm rounds. It’s just an experimental prototype, so having weak spots is totally reasonable.

Hahahahahaha
What a trash update. Stop pleasing the tankers - they never do anything useful anyway)))

All cause one photo of it got leaked in the news :broken_heart:

This tank is popularly called the Goose.

This is Enlisted, not War Thunder. Experimental tanks cannot use better ammunition than production tanks; otherwise, they wouldn’t be event reward vehicles, but premium vehicles that require payment.

1 Like

“Looking at the Japanese Ho-Ri tank and the Soviet SU-9 and T26E4 tanks, I think it’s already pointless.”

No, there are too many armchair gamers playing this game now, and they don’t even understand what World War II history is. They only know about War Thunder next door. To be honest, I’m tired of talking to a brick wall. If these idiots ever make this World War II history game a mess, I’ll definitely give them a piece of my mind.

“If you’re really looking for a properly historically accurate game with thorough authenticity, honestly, it would be much faster to just look for a different game. This one has already been past its deadline for several years now. There are way too many special weapons, non-historical battlefields, and so on.”

The World War II history game Enlisted is only halfway complete; don’t use that as an excuse to belittle others. If those keyboard warriors go too far, they should be kicked out. What are these young people who know absolutely nothing about World War II history discussing on the forums? Don’t tell me it’s going to turn into another T-54 vs. Tiger II tank war; then World of Tanks is your best place to be!

“Well, I don’t think it’ll just end with kicking out a few regular users. The development team’s game development direction is already like that, so what can you do about it? After all, they’ve officially announced that they’ll add all sorts of weapons.”

I agree that the game is unfinished, but I hope you would take into consideration that the developers have been following this kind of development direction for the past 5 years."

Solid AP shots only for the gun with lengthy reload speed which takes more than 10 seconds is indeed, pretty bad. Hopefully, this thing gets it’s APCBC shell with HE filler in it instead of stock solid AP shots when finally comes out.

My advice is to continue spending money and wait patiently. Enlisted needs time to improve and refine; complaining won’t change anything.

This is why I hate you armchair War Thunder players; you always like to apply Cold War-era artillery shells to World War II.

As if your hate means anything to me, :rofl: I’ve seen what makes you happy.

You are one of those faction tribalism enjoyers who relentlessly simps for german faction and german faction only. I bet you wouldn’t even have bat an eye and actually agreed with what i have said if this was some tank from your oh so precious german faction that sits on BR 5 with trash solid AP shell with over 10 secs reload speed. Get your biased take elsewhere as i literally don’t care about what completely dishonest and biased people likes you think. :yawning_face: