I’m a fan of both gamemodes but sometimes I want to play more conquest than invasion. Would be great if I can choose to be queued up for one of the two. Perhaps we can work with a preference-system where players can set a preference. So if you choose conquest, the sytem doesn’t necessarily throw you into conquest but it knows that you prefer it, so if there is a conquest game available, you’re thrown in there.
Second. Give me invasion only please lol
Seconded. This seems way more reasonable than other suggestions on this matter I’ve seen. I am talking about the preference setting thing.
I recall that the devs where working on this one but did not find the Q&A where they spoke about it.
But yes, please let us choose between the two. When I am in the mood for the one I want to play that and not randomly play what I rather not want for that moment.
I Agree. Again. I would only queue for airfield invasion non-stop.
Srsly. I enjoy it alot
Yes! Some invasion maps are just so fun and cinematic you just really want to play them more, and then when you get stuck in a conquest map your just like ehhh.
Of course +1 from me.
The good news is that devs said in the latest Q&A that they are working on something like this. So we just need to wait a bit.
devs answered about this, and they are considering the option.
but we don’t know when.
Yea, I really hate conquest, because it’s really corny and frustrating praying for the team to build rally points. Not only that, it’s not very dynamic. You fight over the same house/area over and over.
What’s wrong with that? In invasion, you keep fighting for the same 5 areas too.
Perhaps conquest should be redesigned in a way that makes the gameplay itself more interesting? I.e. a much bigger map, with more than 3 capturable zones which are not just 1 house big, but an entire village, so you need to clear out most of a village in order to seize control?
Well, because there’s map progression. When the site is captured, the defenders get pushed back. It’s more fun if you ask me