Aircraft Carriers/Airfield as Refill/Fixing Spots

Suggestions Other
1

Everyone is Bickering about those Carriers but what about making them Useful like to use the Landing Plattforms/Carriers as for EVERY PLANE as Starting/Fixing those Planes that got Hit by AA [if ever used] or Aircrafts. The Planes of all Factions Axis, Allies, Comintern, Coosphere that those planes first Start from Ground or in Pacific from the Aircraft Carriers so nobody Bickers that those Planes from any Faction has a Start to the Air but they must Start from the Ground aswell to get new Bombs, Ammo, Aircraft fixing etc. Those will give 100xp each time you come back if you need to have Bombs, Ammo.
There will be AA but they will be a little Nerfed so that those are fair aswell for the Infs and Tnks.

Should the Aircarriers/Airfields be Reworked?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
1 Like
2

Add carrier spawn as an option so you can take off from beginning of a game and allow you to choose between air or carrier.

Also it has no place in high BR matches… it makes the Corsair even more redundant.

ABSOLUTELY NOT. This is not war thunder… the games are not long enough to require that.

Sneak that in there will you.

That’s not making them useful for every plane… that’s nerfing every plane.

Which… I’m sure you wouldn’t mind… people love to whine about their power anyway… if you don’t like them then sit your ass in an AA gun and piss them off just like they do to you. Simple.

Also that furthers how bogus it is to camp the resupply… now you’ll have zero momentum! I’m sure you didn’t think of that though as the main point of that is to destroy the power output of every plane.

4

I don’t think he’s a fan.

5

Oh no I wanted to share why I was against the suggestion… crucify me

6

I play Planes and Close Air Support but the Thing is that it is kinda weird to start mid Air in my Opinion. Besides i main the Japanese but the thing with AA is the Following i can only have a Slot of 3 Infs and 1 Tank and the Ta-Se AA Tank may be good for BR 1 and BR 2 but Later the Planes get Stronger and Faster, the Pioneers ingame anf only the Pioneers Regiment can Build AA not a Single Pioneer of other Troops can do that. There should be some AAs in some Maps that you can use so that the People have a Fair chance against the Planes and CAS

1 Like
7

Naturally… you would think it’s weird to start mid air considering almost the entirety of your factions air power is forced to start from the carrier… so the most logical solution for you is to bring other nations DOWN to that level instead of taking yours and bringing it UP to their level.

Makes sense.

8

No that is not what i meant! I meant that COMINTERN, AXIS, ALLIES AND THE ASIAN COOSPEHERE could, can or Should S.T.A.R.T from ground from a Airfield or to an Aircarrier that EVERYONE INCLUDES ME STARTS on the Ground.

9

Yeah. So instead of improving your disadvantage by spawning on the ground you propose to make every other faction have the same disadvantage… instead of just improving yours.

10

One could argue being able to land to repair and rearm on every map is a net buff.

1 Like
11

Spawning from the ground is a nerf.

If you’d have read my original comment you’d notice I worded it in a way to include the function, but to add an option to spawn from the sky… keeping the carrier mechanic if you wanted to land or have the novelty.

What they are suggesting is spawning from the carrier or airfield and forcing landing for resupply… a blanket nerf.

You don’t have to argue on behalf of OP as they can’t even do it themselves… but you do you.

Furthermore even if it was, I’m against that as it allows the same player to covet the plane the entire game despite damage.

12

Maybe I’m being contrarian, or maybe it’s the Japanese main in me but yeah… you should suffer as we have…

Memes aside, so it’s a nerf and a buff? Pick one.

The repair at carrier mechanic is in game already and your scenario doesn’t happen. Plus if it did it’d be balanced due to the downtime of landing and taking off again.

Take your own advice and build an AA gun if you’re scared of planes lol

13

again, not surprised as a jap main you’re in favor of bringing all the other planes down to your level, instead of improving it for yourself.

I’m not denying some people may find landing and repairing useful but IMO you should just get out of the plane and put some work in on the ground if you’re damaged enough.

It IS a nerf forcing to spawn on the ground every time… and it IS a nerf forcing you to land so you can resupply… that’s not up for discussion… it’s a fact… getting the opportunity to repair when you do such? Could be considered as a buff… but it doesn’t outweigh how much it slows you down.

As a jap main you should know the pain of having say a zero up that covets its time in the air when there could be a Ki 100 up

This game doesn’t need to be slowed down.

What? What have you the idea I disliked planes… I couldn’t care less how powerful they are… this is to nerf them and nothing else disguised as a buff.

14

It’s subjective. I actually place a lot of value on the immersion this mechanic brings to plane gameplay. At some point the devs did so as well hence there being carriers in the pacific. Shame it was never fleshed out for everyone else.

And yes as a jap player I can tell you 30 seconds on the ground is not going to kill you.

Slows down gameplay a bit. Oh well? If you want fast paced gameplay, go BR5 jets or play Fortnite.

Personally I’m not even for this part of it tbh. I just can’t stand knee-jerk inflammatory reactions to it merely being suggested. If you had just said “nah disagree and heres why” instead of:

We probably wouldn’t even be arguing right now.

This implies a down tier unless you mean the BR3 zero? If it’s down tier, you’ll probably win anyways unless your team are all bots. Let f2p tier 2 Timmy use the plane slot, its not that big a deal.

You complained about having the ability to repair a plane. If it’s because you don’t want the plane slot to be hogged more, fair enough.

15

You are right… to each their own… which is why I said include the mechanic but have an option if you want to utilize it or not.

I don’t desire to… I like being engaged every second of the moment and believe the wait for spawning in planes at the start of a game and resupplying is enough of a delay to the power aircraft can bring.

And if you find it immersive… more the power to you… however as I’ve stated repeatedly I don’t and wouldn’t like it… but have no objection to it being given to those who do.

30 seconds every single run adds up… especially when games I play usually only go up to around 15 minutes or so.

I do play BRV primarily… now with jets this wouldn’t be that much of a problem however with the heavy bombers it would greatly affect them.

It’s not knee jerk.

I dislike it and explain why every single time it’s brought up… but am neutral to those who want it and wouldn’t mind THE OPTION… just not being forced.

Perhaps you felt personally insulted by that comment and thus your dedication to defending this topic and arguing with me.

And that’s fine… that comment comes purely out of the fact people desire this mechanic so much which the hidden agenda is to slow down plane gameplay because they dislike getting killed by them… and while not everyone may think that it’s why you’ll get people agreeing with this.

We can agree to disagree. I heavily dislike when a plane of an earlier tier is taking up the slot and dumbing down the teams air power… and damage or an enemy killing them is the only way to get them out.

I do think it’s that big of a deal.

You’ve never had a player in BRV take up the fighter slot with say bf 109 that’s pure cannons the entire time while you are getting rocked by tanks and a teammate who’s so incompetent they can’t take off their pre merge 110 G2.

I’m mainly complaining about the fact that they want landing to resupply and spawning from ground to be forced every time.

I have repeatedly said that I will be somewhat reasonable and agree if you want the option then that’s fine… just not be be forced.

And yes, I also said that in general I’m against this for that reason… but it’s what’s going to happen as a byproduct and is inevitable… that situation happens regardless.

16

Fair enough. Agree to disagree.

Devs definitely need to address carriers still one way or another. That I think we agree on at least.

1 Like
17

Hmmm, I think it would be nice if airfields were in every map

18

the amount of tanks that can be spammed and rushed towards objective does not vibe well with requiring landing for every resupply.

19

Yes but, airfields would be a optional thing to resupply and repair from