Thats dumb cuz A6M5 is 5.3BR in War Thunder but its BR III plane
War Thunder Battle Ratings are flawed
Ki-61-II is 4.7 in War Thunder
Ki-100 is 4.0 in war thunder
Guess which of these 2 planes has superior performance. Ki-100.
Thats dumb cuz A6M5 is 5.3BR in War Thunder but its BR III plane
War Thunder Battle Ratings are flawed
Ki-61-II is 4.7 in War Thunder
Ki-100 is 4.0 in war thunder
Guess which of these 2 planes has superior performance. Ki-100.
Il-8 has two 500kg bombs (2,200lbs). 1k bombs should be exclusive to br5. il8 got br4 probably because the plane itself sucks for br5.
Su2 on br2 has 1,322 lbs of bombs.
Russia tu-2s has 3,300lbs of bombs in br5. (Ju-188 has the same)
That’s 2,000lbs difference from br2 to br5. 666lb load increase per br. 1,322+666=1,988lbs for br3. Basically what the grizzly has.
The standard has also always been that attackers get significantly more payload than fighters. For br3 u.s. fighter’s standard is 1,000 lbs.
Also, the grizzly is a giant slow target, if you don’t want one flying around in br3, how about you just kill it instead of trying to nerf it out of existence eh?
Make note that the environment or/and what is valued from the aircrafts are completely different between these 2 games. As far as I could tell WT has entirely had their BR balanced around A2A (as that game has separate ground RB BR for planes) so imho WT’s BR shouldn’t apply here.