It is far inferior to the weakest BR III tank, the Panzer IV F2.At the same time, the defense is inadequate and no turret. Therefore, at BR III, not many players are willing to use it.In order to allow players to use it more, please move it to BR II.
20 Likes
Nah, now that you said this, the devs are gonna make it BR V
1 Like
StuG III F, 50mm frontal armour, 30mm side armour.
No MG, decent gun with high pen is nice though alongside the low profile which helps hide, very useful in War Thunder but in Enlisted tanks spend most of their time supporting infantry which F variant of the StuG is not good at, Pz IV way better for infantry support.
I think it is well within reason to move Stug III F from BR3 to BR2, its 50mm armour which is roughly the same as the BR1 Panzer III J wont break balance, while its gun while worthy of BR3 because of its AT capabilities, it had enough downsides to justify it going down to BR2.
Axis could choose between Marder III for MG or StuG for enclosed fighting compartment, but overall wont change balance but it will make me very very happy to use the StuG more often.
6 Likes
I hope they move it. And maybe StuG III A to BR I?
not necessary since StuG A has faster reload.
3.3 reload is great for infantry support.
Gaijin has never moved a 7.5cm howitzer cannon to BR1 anyway so they wont start with StuG A anyway.
Alright then
I mean Im not going to rant about it again, Ive ranted so much on this topic even Im fed up with it.
Its a no brainer move to move it to BR2, literally no reason not to.
1 Like
The DF nerf was long overdue. They need to do the same to the open-topped Marder H at that BR.
Just remember the pain of being in a German Tier II lineup and facing a KV-1. There was just nothing you could do!w they need to do the same to the open-topped Marder H at that BR.