In my case, I would carry 86 Projectiles. But that’s just my opinion because I like to make good use of the 88 for supporting allied infantry.The 70 projectiles limit can remain as is, provided they add vehicle weapon customization.
1 Like
People don’t like 88 or think it’s excessive, but the amount is correct. Which tanks are you referring to that are lacking their maximum ammunition capacity?
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
You go a source for that to back that claim it up?
They would need to add new ammo racks/ change existing ammo racks so I doubt that darkflow staff can just do that on their own without beeging the WT to revise their own model based of trust me bro.
It’s the first thing that comes up on Google when you search for maximum capacity. It’s as obvious as the high rate of fire of the MG42.
That’s true, that’s why I mentioned implementing a vehicle weapon customization system Which would take time for the Devs to add And I think adding 10 and 16 projectiles won’t take them any time. I want to believe that, at least.
I don’t see the Tiger 2H having 3 extra armor plates attached to the turret from a Jumbo jet.I also don’t see three spaced plates on the Tiger 2 chassis, nor a heavy machine gun on top of the turret like on the Super Pershing.
one yes because the super pershing is only a turret yes not a hull to be seen with br4 armor
wait so the heavy machine gun on the super pershing can penetrate the armor of a tiger 2 h and kill othe crew wow thats the real wonder weapon
no silly me the super machine gun can only kill br4 heavy tanks and not do usless things like kill infantry and apcs like every other machine gun crazy me that make it only as useful as every other machine gun in the game and not worth mentioning. and i forgot the magic forcefield which covers the entire tank meaning the shield is a forcefield making the tank well armored and not a thin skinned br4 tank with 100mm of armor
wish i could use paint but no its impossible to
shoot under the shield
shoot over the shield
shoot the half of each side of the turret
i mean silly me it must be an energy barrier or only half the front and side of the turret would be protect meaning you are as likely to miss the shield as hit it
again rip of the shield
armor the hull and turret to h standards and give the super pershing a real gun 
or just give us the world of tank super pershing
None i’m just saying how peoples opinions are affected simply by the nation the suggestion is for
You suggest some crazy down low depraved squad for japan… everyone’s likes it.
You suggest the same for germany… mfs get my post locked.
Honestly it’s already quite difficult to run out of ammo in the Tiger II, giving it more shells would just make it easier to ammo rack, not like it’s difficult to ammo rack it the way it is right now.
1 Like
More shells - more powerful explosion.
1 Like
Considering that the Tiger 2s in War Thunder also have 70 shells, chances are Gaijin themselves believe that’s how much ammunition the tanks could carry. If you want to refute that you’re going to have to bring up historical sources and stuff. The first source you find on Google is not going to be good enough.
On the topic of the Super Pershing because someone brought it up, even with the extra armour plates it still has worse protection than the Tiger 2. It having a roof mounted HMG is hardly an argument in its favour either considering how unwise it is to stick out of the tank while in combat.
2 Likes
Add a proper source to the suggestion, without it it will be locked
Here is the info on Wikipedia :
And its corresponding source :
However I don’t have access to this very specific book myself.
There it is, it’s incredible that this is needed for something as obvious as the high rate of fire of the MG42
I only mentioned the Pershing because he always has to bring up the Tiger 2H with any post related to Germany; he complains about the reload speed, and I even gave an example.Things the Tiger 2H lacks compared to the Pershing include spaced armor and enemy tank parts.
Just as they added Su-46s, they should also add the maximum amount of projectiles and start working to acquire the missing ammunition.
Obvious? According to who? You can’t just claim anything you want is “obvious” and express outrage over needing to prove it.
I’m not sure if you have fully read my comment but if you did you would have noticed that I pointed out that, even with the additional armour of the SP, it’s still less protected than the Tiger 2. All the applique armour does is improve its protection above that of the regular Pershing, a tank which obviously doesn’t hold a candle to the King Tiger in terms of armour.
I don’t know what a Polish locomotive has to do with anything but the devs have not added such a thing into the game.
1 Like
Go for it - support your contention with actual evidence…
I’m referring to the comment from the person who only mentions the Tiger 2H and complains about the reload speed. I gave examples of what the Tiger 2H lacks, unlike the Super Pershing, regardless of whether It’s weak compared to the Tiger 2’s, I only mentioned it.
You know perfectly well what I mean, “We cannot deprive the Soviets of a new technology”
Well, the information is there, and 70 projectiles is not the maximum amount, but rather 84-86 for the H turret.
The only thing you mentioned about the Tiger 2 lacking which is actually valid is not having a roof mounted HMG.
Oh you meant the Su-9? Why did you call it a Su-46 if that’s what you’re refering to. Also I still fail to see what that has to do with anything.
Well if the information is there, give it here and let people judge if it’s good enough. It’s that shrimple.
This topic was automatically closed after 4 days. New replies are no longer allowed.