Replace the additional assaulter in enginer squad to an additional flamethrowers, is something f2p dont use often because the limit of 3 squad slot and an assaulter squad usually is better choice overall
3 Likes
Flammerwerfer squad is the most salty and cheated thing people can use.
Hopefully not a lot of people have noticed it yet.
I prefer it to stay like this.
So for me, it’s a no.
14 Likes
If our no count something probably today this game was better
Anyway
I disagree to your disagree
What the benefits you think doing this?
Let more ppl (or let you and me) having access to an (extra) flamethrower?
TBH, we don’t need more players using flamers. Already: Every time I use them i feel scummy not OP- just scummy and annoying.
BTW, when I was new to this game and noobish I used far more flamethrowers than i now do, And i think that cancerous thing will be overused if letting f2p/new players having access to them.
It’s like the M13 MGMC at the first sight very powerful, but no, its just annoying. Easy to kill and deal with, but just - annoying.
2 Likes
More varation in squad upgrade
Whenever I get fed up with the PPsh/PPD spam on Moscow I just roll out two flamesquads and make them sovs suffer. 
3 Likes
On one hand, this would let me use more flamethrowers, which I would like.
On the other hand, this would result in other people using more flamethrowers, which I would not like.
3 Likes
thats a good idea, would make the E squad more useful now that they lost the MG nest supremacy and soon also will lose the AT gun supremacy to the AT squad. also makes somewhat sense that a squad responsible for heavy work like engineers would get the heavy flamer dudes
Must disagree on this.
We already can use 3 assaulters squads in rotation, and everyone know it’s cheap, and cancerous.
Your suggestion would make having 3 squads with flamers used in rotation possible. It’s worse. The flamethrower class is meant (and is) to be powerful and a priority target for the enemy team due to the extreme danger it poses.
Hence why it’s limited atm, which is fine.
I know war is hell. But it’s not necessary to make it biblical by engulfing the entire playing field in fire the whole match…
Flamethrowers were typically associated with engineer battalions historically.
The balance concern is just that your dedicated flamethrower squad only has two, and the rest of the squad utility is fairly sparse. So being able to use one on an engineer squad that then gets all the well-rounded benefits of an engineer squad would be somewhat unequal.
You know what ? Fuck updating the game
They need to update the forums to include a dislike button
2 Likes
+1 for spittin facts
The more you complain, the more ppsh I’m going to use.
2 Likes
Ppsh41. I hate facing it… But I love using it 
I just have no right to complain. It’s a really fun smg.
1 Like
this simply made my day
1 Like
Well. Only if we can limit it to engineer I somehow. Otherwise meh.