I cant live withaut t34 vs pz2
1 Like
Too many queues or imbalanced matches.
Being thrown against well equipped infantry, because you get 1 tank.
No matches for meta spammers.
Meta spam still exists.
POV: you have a game with 200+ weapons and vehicles but you see only 20 because yes.
Thats why setups would be introduced.
2 Likes
Lol now you see only ppsh41,fedorov,m2,thompson drum,tiger 2,t34,stg,fg42,avt40,p47
How much variety, the only varied faction are the Japanese for obliviusly reason
Why is that?
Finding similar BR shouldn’ be more difficult than in the new system.
That’s the flaw of the new system (proposed by devs) so I don’t get it.
? You spam meta = high rang = you play against meta spamers.
It will always exist. But we can make it smaller.
Who cares?
I’m talking about the teased system vs my proposal. I don’t care about what we have now as anything is better.
What whe have now is the result of mix equipment of different gear togheter
What you and joe are asking!
Dont work and people spam only meta, the new system is made expecially for try to Half-solve this and ease the pressure on new player other than let old player play more relaxed matched
Except no?
Now you can face 9 FG42 even if you have a mossin.
In new system you will face 9 FG42 if you have 1 FG42.
In our system you will face 9 FG42 if you also have 9 FG42.
5 queues depending on how much guns had been swapped to more cooler ones
How many players who not only unlocked meta gun, but also had enough resources to fully equip their squads with it?
Or we can just reduce number of assaulter to 3 for all 4 squads and not make overcomplicated system.
joe always said he like see strong foe on the battlefield even if him is outgunned and as always him back his idea, something i respect because he never changed it
The same you are backing here
? What 5 queues?
Then it will take ppl who have a bit worse gear.
So it at worst it will acheave the same results as proposed mm while also acheaveing better results (at least from time to time).
So again, our system is the same or better.
It’s still meta spam.
Also I wouldn’t say that adding numbers is a complicated system.
I guess it is in comparison to how lazy not complicated the proposed system is.
I don’t see how mm that makes you face equally equipped oponents has to do with being outgunned.
Because the avarage of 3 squads is not always equal to the max BR of the equipment you use, place shitty gun in strategic place or veichle because they count as player equipment for lower it is an exploitable way for use good equipment aganaist player with weak equipment
And im not talking about endgame vs low-end but very good mid-tier aganaist low-tier
Mp35/I aganaist some sten or lanchester
Propsed system takes into account the quality of the best weapon
Our system takes into account the quality and quantity of your weapons.
How is this bad?
So getting only one good gun in each squad will allow you to play with good gun all the time, but against enemies, fully equipped with less powerful guns.
So your system makes no point of having fully equipped squad which is bad for devs, because longer progression = money.
So you will have one MP44 and 10 shitty guns. Is that really an issue?
You can test it yourself. Take one gun to your setup and try to use it as often as possible.
How much time you will use it? You will have only 3-5 spawns with it per game and you can die easily to anything.
And all you will have are some garbage weapons.
I’d preffer to progress to have more fun instead of progress to ease the suffering.
I guess progression fueled by frustration suddenly became a good buisness tactic.
But if it will be 3 StG and 12 kriegsmodells, you will play with StG 90% of the time.
Our game works so, that if you kill player, you easily kill his whole squad after that.
Yes
if i have 1 mp44 in every squad with only 4 guy with 3 of them with a kar and as tank i use the pz2, i can use mp44 all time and play aganaist people with what garand and some thompson M1A1
Much fair spam assault rifle aganaist the worst smg of the game