About pacífic planes spam

If something is Bad as hell is the fact that how badly designed the aircraft Carrier mechanic work allowing the americans to rush the point on their Jets or spam P-47 rockets at the very beggining of the Match something that Japan to beggin with they don’t have that nasty amount of firepower and 2 it would be Even nastier if both nations could do it cuz there would be no place safe for infantery and 3 many Japan planes are forced to Spawn on carriers which screws them most of the times since they can’t keep that same pressure of air support as americans do

So My suggestion is to remove the Aircraft Carrier Spawn for all planes and use the standard method instead (1:30 of the Game at least to Spawn planes) or make all the planes which don’t Spawn of carriers use airfields instead and also give a reason to use the landding gears and takeoff flaps aswell

So here i am asking to the forum:

Which solution is the Best?

  • Add airfields for non aircraft Carrier planes
  • Remove the Aircraft Carrier mechanic
  • No i love spamming rockets to japanese lol
0 voters

In case You selected the airfields mechanic would You like to also add it to other maps and campaings?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
3 Likes

Airfields! Airfields, please!

Why remove a mechanic when you can expand thw game?

3 Likes

They already added a spawn delay in the pacific for air-spawned planes

3 Likes

MORE AIRFIELDS,please

3 Likes

Why are you acting so blind to how much this will slow down the (aircraft) game and make them near worthless? Or do you just not care.

Wouldn’t solve issue of camping a spawn either when two people in a plane end up who is behind each other first and then kill their next cycle. now they can just camp the airfield.

Half of the reason i don’t bother with warthunder (especially) air because you have to take off? wtf?

Do you really expect me to do that each time i want to engages in air to air combat? You might say yes… my time says otherwise.

Its introduction in pacific was only for novelty and slight convenience given you can repair… i have no idea why they added it as other planes in this game took off from carrier… it only serves to slow down gameplay and a nice “hey! that’s cool” for new players.

Correct.

Assuming that the airfield won’t have air defence…?

Which was never going to happen.

I do.

Oh no, you need to carefully consider where you spend your time, effort, and resources in a combined arms video game?

Heaven forbid.

Does someone feel cheated out of an air-kill because a skilled enemy pilot landed a clutch carrier landing?

Having a safe area to retreat to is also good for gameplay, it gives slower and/or less manouverable planes the chance to regroup and survive otherwise one-sided engagements. It wouldn’t be fair otherwise on the P-38s who relies on the element of surprise to engage Japanese fighters (they’re not winning a dogfight with a Zero, or anythig else for that matter).

I’m sorry for not wanting to dumb down air combat.

Hm… last time i suggested similar feature it was wrote off as toxic… funny how it’s used here.

I’d love to say if you don’t care then don’t have n opinion but… as we all know i cannot say that

So do the carriers… i can still spawn camp jap or american planes just as well… it only gives them a sense of security and a wall to run to so they can avoid death.

Key words, video game… which are meant to be fun… spending a minute to use aircraft each time… isn’t.

No matter how you look at it… it becomes a repetitive and tedious task that even if you like it i guarantee you already find annoyance in doing it.

Oh…?

Are you the guy who proudly said that you’d kill yourself instead to deny the enemy the kill…?

Yeah, I don’t care what you have to say about air combat, then. The air is the battlefield of gentlemen, you clearly don’t belong.

Do I need to explain the difference between “denying an enemy a kill by playing the game as intended” a and abusing a mechanic in a unintended and petty way…? The difference is skill and sportmanship.


Incorrect.

I don’t care about your opinion.

Can’t say I’ve let that happe to me in a long while.

It’s not hard to climb altitude and sit at the edge of the carrier spawn… you are acting like it prevents it and does anything but functionally act as a safe zone for people to run to.

Running to your carrier spamming rudders to break enemies lead indicator then landing and as you say preventing them the kill is no different than suicide when i see them behind me… just one takes more time… seems to be a theme.

Sure, Jean.

Opinion discarded, have a nice day, and I look forward to seeing you on the field of battle.

Unless you wet your pants and kill yourself first.

Unfortunately you wont because as ive stated previously i stick to my wheelhouse in console only bullying the small fry.

Funny how you’re so fixated on that… i simply noted the correlation between that toxic behavior and you using it as an argument.

Yes, airfields are very well implemented in the BIG ACTION mode.

On the other side i would like to only add that Japan has better planes that USA in almost every BR, but more planes should be the top priority for Jap. army.

1 Like