- Yes
- No
0
voters
What if we make this gun able to aim down the sigths but we reduce it’s belt to 50-75 bullets instead of handicapping the gun with an annoying mechanic?
I would give it terrible recoil if not mounted or prone. It would still be usable in close range but if you want to be accurate you need to lay down
1 Like
This is probably the best fix, and the one they’re likely not gonna do.
They could give the model an attachable handle and allow it to be fired while crouching or standing at a heavy dispersion penalty or at a high recoil penalty. But limiting it to just proning and mounting is too restrictive for an MG.
It’s 14 KG. It shouldn’t have exaggerated recoil. Just give it less ammo and that’s it, now it’s more comparable to what other nations have on BR IV.
I think it was more reference to design of the gun that fits quite poorly to sighted shots while standing.
But yes, AT rifles etc etc etc.
It has no stock to shoulder the thing, so I don’t think so…?
Full-auto just wouldn’t work with this thing unless you mount it on something.
If it downed to BR3 - with 50 rounds, heavy movement penalty, remove prone firing restriction. It would be more interesting to pick and offer more MG playstyle as there were only bunch of 20-round BARs to use at this BR.
Duplicate of: Give the Browning M1919A4 (BR IV) 50 or 75 rounds and make it be able to fire without restrictions
Closed