Maybe I think the battlefield restriction for pilots can be removed? Sometimes I survived the fight and made crash landing , but when my pilot got out of the firing plane, I just started to bleed and soon died. Well, in this case, whats the point of having weapon and equipment slots for pilots? Or, maybe please enlarge the scale of the battlefield so that different units could show their benefit/advantages better. For example, tanks wont crowd in a narrow corridor because thats the only path with less obstacles which could be run over by tanks; Snipers wont encounter machine gunners in such a short range as snipers should have to be the ghost in the war. Of course players can rush to a point with sniper rifle, but please at least provide more possibilities for players.
Thank you for all your wonderful work already done in the game, it will be better soon
I suspect they already work on some sort of large scale mode. They hinted they were testing servers capabilities for more players per match. As for what it will actually be… Time will tell 🤷
How about…
Human wave attack?
With nkvd shoot you if you retreat
no step back comrade
You really wanna walk 10.000 meters to the action? Thats some dedication.
Well then at least let pilots equip with parachute…
Well, with most of current maps being actually subsections of a few mega-maps, it would make sense to try and exploit all the available terrain at once.
That would be fantastic. But for that they would need to double or triple the amount of players per match, else it would become a walking simulator like one experiment they made in hell let loose 
But I’d love it.
In another thread, we’ve been brainstorming about possible ways to have long matches like enduring confrontation in WT.
One of the idea was basically using the whole map as if it was a giant conquest or assault match, where the frontline would shift back and forth, so all the map would be used but the action would be concentrated in one-two sectors at a time, to avoid excessive dispersion.
@14052296
@14052296
so in short (NORMANDY)
landing:
*D-day
*Omaha
- ver sur mer
- ruins of roux (or whatever it’s called, however this map is a landing because the Americans depart from the forest in front of the beach)
“Objective” allies:
a single landing must be completed successfully
“objective” axis:
repel the naval air invasion
(RULE):
1)in case of at least one successful landing the Americans will divide into 2 or more groups and try to conquer the adjacent areas (airfield, lee-bree,or unoccupied beach)
2)the Germans will instead have to counterattack and regain the beaches
3)in case all the landings are successful the Americans they win at the table
4)if all landings fail the Germans win at the table
5)the faction wo control all map win the battle
6)the american need to mantain at least one beach or they loose
7)the german need to mantain arfield or lebree or they loose
8)all faction have 100.000 tik so wen a faction end them loose,The tik are regained conquering the area (airfield,lebree ecc.)
SPECIAL RULE:
Ex:
*lose airfield stop the germany from have air support *lose lebree stop germany from have tank support
*the American after the landing have a limited time for conquer the normandy, after the time end they lose tank and air support and a timer for their defeat start. the only way(for the american)to regain tank and air support is conquer or airfield(air) or lebree(tank)
That is a myth, though, debunked many a times. The standard practice was capture the panicking soldiers who are running away, try to organize them back into units capable of fighting, send them back into battle.
Soviets were actually short on manpower, especially early in the war (they needed to keep lots of troops elsewhere), they simply couldn’t afford to mass-execute their own soldiers.
P.S.: Not that the executions didn’t happen, they did, like in any other army of the time, but not on a massive scale.
let’s say the myth is right in the fact that stalin purged more than half of the army officers just because he was obsessed with the ghost of troski so I don’t find it hard to believe that he ordered NKVD officers to shoot their troops in Stalingrad if they retreated
True. Not just because of Trotsky, but true.
Not true, please watch:
And i say
quote correctly, I said “I don’t find it hard to believe” I didn’t say “I believe blindly”
about his person there are a lot of stories and after a long time now the truth is dead and buried, so on the basis of what is done at the command of his nation everyone is free to decide to believe what they wants on order n.227 who says it’s true who doesn’t everyone believe what they wants based on what stalin “did in his life in charge of the soviet union”