75/32 M41 to BR 2 with some buffs

Suggestions Battle Rating
4

you can suggest even now, Im sure it would be popular.
People are eager for any Italian content.

1 Like
5

I will here soon but you know I have to get a short history and all that other info for my suggestions

6

It’s very goofy looking, I like it.

2 Likes
7

Historically speaking back in Africa those Italian TD with their famous HEATs were able to defeat Matilda tanks (75mm KV1 like armor) - Germany did not have long 75mm on tanks at that time. In other words, Italy actually had better vehicle based anti tank capabilities than Germany.

So I do think those Italian vehicles could see more love for sure - that being said current M41 is quite nice in BR1, so changing it makes no sense what so ever.

Adding an event BR2 version with those big HEATs would be fun tho, together with some later BR3 and BR4 versions for the TT of course.

8

NGL, I would like to see this beauty in the tech tree.
image

75/34 M42 | War Thunder Wiki

8 Likes
9

I would too but I would like the current one to have better Anti-Infantry capabilities and if it did get HE people would demand it gets moved up to BR II.

10

So, how much pen does said HEAT even have? Like its a BR1 vehicle and it being able to take out all BR2 vehicles doesn’t seem unfair considering it has no MG and is a poor SPG. Maybe giving it its HEATs while staying in BR1 is only on paper too much.

Panzer III J has more armor and its gun can take out all BR2 vehicles already.

11

100 mm of pen. It’s APHE has 77mm of pen and I think it can over pressure.

12

not the issue here, its HEAT shells are excellent in anti-infantry/support role.
There are no tanks with 75mm cannons on BR1 with HE. Just none which wont change anytime soon.

2 Likes
13

I was about to give you so much shit for voting yes to this and no to chaffee.

But suggesting a different 75 with aphe/abcbc and he shells is just as bad. The axis hypocrisy is real.

14

The Chaffee and this are very different.

2 Likes
15

Chaffe with turret, MG, more crew…
idiocracy is real.

5 Likes
16

This only matters if you don’t have fingers to simply rotate the tank. Ass excuse.

I wonder how many kills tank mgs get in comparison to he shells.

It’s very clear the guy posting loli german anime waifus and the kid named after a german vehicle are as biased as they come.

17

Matters a lot more than you think.

It’s an Italian Vehicle that I want buffed, try again.

18

so you ignore objective advantages and everyone else is biased, but you. Yeah sure you must right.

5 Likes
19

  1. BR2 is most overbloated BR in the game, there’s no need to move stuff from other BRs to it.

  2. this vehicle is far more unique on BR1 than it would be on BR2 with classic ammo layout.

So no, thanks. Not a good suggestion.

3 Likes
20

I would prefer this for BR I as it would have an MG to help it fight 75/18 M41 | War Thunder Wiki
Which I have already suggested: 75/18 m41
Or it could be the one for BR II while the current one stays at BR I. But until they add the other model, I want HE on this one.

21

One a high velocity gun, enclosed tank destroyer with heat and he I am sure you would give the same favor to a ussr tank, give the option to vote for he and heat separately , because yeah that sure seems fair against the us br2 tanks a td that can be killed by mg fire and one that turns and has the profile of a double Decker dumster

22

Me personally I would only give it HE because it’s APHE is sufficient already even at higher BRs against enemy tanks.

1 Like
23

I have no problem with giving a td with thin armor , no mg or turret he to kill infantry
But not heat rounds heat slight less pen then ap or aphe but more then he
75mm he big but not 88mm and up big splash

Add a poll to just add he and I’ll vote yes

1 Like