btw you still can build ammo boxes around the map in corners, most player dont notice them/dont care about them.
even marked with icons 
Cowardice. If I run out of ammo, then itâs time for the knife.
2 Likes
No, it would allow those who give 3 TnTs to every of their soldiers even more advantageâŚ
1 Like
Big grenade pouch should also be removed tbh
More than once change can and should be made at a time
Within a reasonable timeframe
2 Likes
that " die " implies to throw your self taking as many enemy as possible leading ( eventually ) to your death.
I donât see whatâs wrong with the ammo perk. IF we put it in wisely.
Sturmgewehr said a problem. Good perception. Extra ammo and 3 grenades are not good. But it can be solved. For example, if ammo perk requires 16 gun handling points. So itâs unlikely that even the throwing perk will can equip too. You may have extra ammo and grenades but then you throw them like a retiree. Or the ammo perk closes one grenade slot. Or two. You can choose to have a lot of ammo, but not a grenade. It could also cause negative effects. More ammo- more weight- movement penalty.
Aside from random perk points, the current system works for me. But it can still be expanded. Just always have to think about the consequences. I also have a new perk idea, for example: faster main gun or mg reload into the tank. Or faster mg cooling. Or slower overheating. But it wouldnât be a bad thing to start with if it mattered if there was a loader in the tank at all.
because⌠thereâs literally 0 reasons to put it.
how many times do i have to say it.
although, itâs my personal opinion.
more like, said the obv?
which⌠looks like it was needed when in reality, i thought it was obvious.
you probably werenât playing in enlisted during the alpha.
long story short,
back in the alpha you were able to have 5 to 6 slots ( to put medkits, repair tools and grenades ) while having the possibility to use perk to enhance ammonutions.
although it wasnât necessary because back than, standard ammo for everyone were like the current soldiers with at least the smal pouche.
so we had supersoldiers with lots of ammo and throwing 3 det pack every time.
âweâ used to call them " supersoldiers ".
i guess thereâs a reason why that is no longer the case and backpack/pouches got introduced.
1 Like
No, I didnât play alpha. But as you can see, the situation is different. Like you said, the current base ammunition stockpile is smaller and a bag is required for 2/3 grenades, which eliminates extra ammunition. It canât happen that you say thereâs a lot of ammunition and grenades in these people. This or that. But not two at once. Limitation is the point. And based on my idea that the ammunition perk excludes the grenade slot, there is also no supersoldier problem. What you outlined, like the alpha, is a typical case of recklessness. But this system is no longer the same.
I understand your fear. Because itâs legitimate. No one wants super soldiers with 600 rilfe ammo + 3 grenades. But, currently the explosives are the big problem in the game. Not a lot of ammunition. If there is a limit to whether you choose this or that, you cannot develop what you are afraid of. On the contrary, it increases variety. If someone sacrifices his grenade and/or other perk to get extra ammo while still dying from a single shot, I still donât see whatâs wrong with that. Thatâs what I think. Then itâs up to the developers to decide whoâs right.
1 Like
What???
You need 2 bullets to drop and 2 to finish off your opponent without regard to misses, hitting limbs and shooting at range.
For full auto weapons, 60-70% of the shots are misses because dispersion
2 Likes
thatâs why you run with extended mags?
if you canât hit for shit, then again. learn to aim.
Post stats
1 Like
donât forget the shitty network latency of the server as well
1 Like
No offense he is a much better player than you so I donât think you are qualifed to teach him, he can get 250+kills even with 3 maxed allies with p47 and m2 with 3xtnts on the opposite side.
1 Like
Iâm telling you the accuracy statistics of a good battlefield player.
If you think youâre hitting more than 30-40% of your bullets, youâre lying to yourself.
So itâs impossible to kill more than 20 people with 120 rounds of some mp43
2 Likes
you see, i never claimed to be good though.
but that doesnât make me suggest unlogical suggestion of increasing ammo.
( crazy. i know )