I’m all for it, but the small squad size is the only thing that’s keeping this overpowered SMG in BR II.
Giving the squad another soldier is all well and good, but then the weapon would need to be nerfed either with stat changes or a higher BR. Hard to justify, since it’s a premium.
But, P2W isn’t acceptable either at the same time.
Exactly right! My friend
Even if you assign a position and I am given the task of equipping an anti-armor soldier or even an ordinary infantryman, I can still accept it.
At least restore the squad to its original 6-member structure.
Of course, there should also be a restoration of the 5-person composition for the female medical personnel in the Soviet Union.
Perhaps it was a correct decision to raise the “Sichuan-made” Thompson from the American faction to level 3, while also increasing his attack power to 6.8 and 4.0.
The previous attack power was 6.8 and 3.4.
As we might have seen - many people want chinese squad to have the same amount of men then other premium units. Why?
All other assaulters premiums have 6 men
1 men can save your battle sometimes. It’s a real helps to have an extra member in your squad especially if you play assault - aggressive squad with heavy losses
Argument about 5 smg as reword don’t work since we have 5 smg assault squads with 6-th specialist
One men with an open slot give you an option to choose weapon you like to fight with. I often use bp weapons which makes my squad strong
Common TT squad have 7 members. 2 guys more! A radioman often. Why should I pay to play weakening squad without ability to call artillery?