Why would you want a half-track the maps are tiny
the trucks on the district map are super important to blitz the town at the start of the game. half tracks would protect the infantry from getting murked from a submachine gun blast
Why do you want a boat theres no water
Yes as a shield to make sure my soldiers actually get there and provide MG fire
I’ll have you know most maps have a river, stream, small lake, or large pond that can absolutely accommodate a gunboat
I find myself playing this on the long run. So I dropped serious money on having everything unlocked on the campaign I ill main. (I’ll do the same in berlin) maybe because I m in a position my job, life can afford me to do so. I understand if others can’t right now. But you guys srsly don’t have 10 or 20 euros to spare in a month on something you do daily its something wrong on ur economy.
So, my advise is spending 1 extra slot per month or so if you find ur self playing this on the long run.
I truly support the idea of f2p players having the same content as pay ones, with the cost bn huge time grind cards or whatever. But, if you find yourself hooked on a hobby in this case playing this game, why don’t you invest 10 euros 20 or so once a month for 2 or 3 months to have everything?
If you don’t have 10 or 20 euros, whatever, why have u have internet in the first place?!
Right now I woudnt care if they gave all slots avaiable to f2p players. There will be always something people will complain. You want more for less, that’s just wrong
1 Like
Lol you mean floating target practice for everyone? I’m in
MBK 161 in foot-deep water would best most German players
No it’s not the ability to have both a plane and tank in a game is not on the table without paying money, i am not arguing for extra infantry slots and and specifically point out that the slots should be seperate so people can’t abuse the feature and will have to pay to bring a 2nd tank/plane, in addition with the economy change the value of premium time has gone sky high so i don’t see my suggestion having a negative financial effect, and again remember what i am saying is the ability to bring both a plane and a tank and the 2 being seperate kinds of slots so people can’t just bring a 2nd tank or play without paying
1 Like
you’ve completely missed the mark
1 Like
We ones looked deep into Steam stats and there is like a sub-culture of gamers who don’t pay for games. Tens of millions of people with only free or f2p games on their accounts.
There where just too many games like that + rampant pirating in some countries that makes it really weird for some people to actually pay for games.
Some of them have perception that because there are “rich” people or people with money, those should pay. They themselves “don’t have” money so it’s their right to not pay for games.
But it’s in their rights to demand the same experience as someone who pays for their f2p experience!?, this is my point.
Again I m not excluding the option of a f2p player to have everything a pay player have, as long as there is serious grind to obtain the same item or experience
What I m against. Is people demanding more without a single contribute. I just want that because it’s unfair. But, I won’t spend a since cent on something I ill see myself doing for months
And isn’t because I m rich or poor. It’s a simply decision. If I find myself doing this ‘hobby’ daily and I enjoy it, why can’t I spend money supporting it!? Will I demand the same experience without spending a since cent because I belive in my mind it’s unfair?
For a f2p player it’s unfair a pay one to have everything
For a pay one, a f2p want to have all I have just because it’s unfair for us that payed in the first place.
Right!?
if there is a account wipe when the game launches im paying premium 100%
there won’t be
1 Like
They stated there will be no more whipes.
1 Like
that’s contradicting your own point slot can’t be grinded and i’m not arguing for that, there’s a fundamental difference between more normal vehicle/infantry slots and have the ability to bring a plane and a tank in the same match it’s different from complaining about being unable to bring more different infantry squads
That pretty much sums up the pirate mantra in eastern countries 10-15 years ago. “Why I should pay for something that is so expensive and economy in my country sucks! I won’t buy it anyway, so developers are not loosing any profits.”
Pirating didn’t die because economy got better, it heavily went down because of more intrusive protection measures and games requiring continuous patches.
Here we are looking at a situation where developers of most of the successful f2p games are not even located in developed but developing countries. So is this is the only way for good f2p to be successful now? Or perhaps the culture around these subjects should be changed? Games are luxury, they are not fundamental right, I don’t see a reason why non-paying customers should have access t anything beyond the “demo” content that should be enough to make a decision to buy or not to buy.
1 Like
kinda find it hard to believe but okay
I see, that’s a good post you did there. I fully agree and I understand your first post now.
Humm
I agree with this
1 Like