Just wondering for how many battles will it stay at 100%. Also, am I alone or is there someone else with 100% win rate despite multiple battles?
2 Likes
Infinite if you don’t swap to Eastern Europe and even on EEU it’s still incredibly hard to lose.
1 Like
You should get more XP for losing as the Americans because it’s so hard
1 Like
I don’t measure pleasure and success with the fake winrates in this game.
If you leave the battle like a coward you will keep your 100% for example.
It’s only true if people stay until the end.
I have 94% with about 90 battles for the US. So it’s pretty damn close.
1 Like
Thats why they should have made either early war gear on early war maps
Or late war gear on late war maps.
Late war gear on early war maps will give massive disadvantages to the japanese. Late war maps are like D-day for US
I kind of get what you mean, but the Maps we have now don’t resemble at all the places there intended to represent.
But Early war Kit for the US and Japanese would be far better balanced, then the current mash up we have of 44/45 kit and 41/42 kit.
We all know that the problem is not only about the gear but how the actuall gear was implemented.
It’s a game, you don’t have in real life ability to rebalance weapons by changing horizontal or vertical recoil points and ability to aim weapon with sights (which are terrible and bugged in case of Japanese LMGs).
My view on this campaign regarding equipment:
- Bolt-action are equal for both sides
- I don’t trust Semi-Autos and i find them in fact bad on both sides, still Johnson is a bit better for Allied side
- There is extreme difference in balance regarding tanks, Ta-Se is worse than M13 (right now it’s a bit better but before it was terrible), Ha-Go is complete joke compared to M2A4, and M3 is just better than Ke-Ni, Axis have advantage in Ka-Chi which can be considered best tank in the campaign (but it’s premium)
- Regarding planes, i find Buffalo best starting plane in this campaign, Allies have advantage as they can spawn both Fighter (best there) and Attacker vs defenceless Attacker on the Axis side
- There is also extreme difference in the case of MGs, japanese MG’s introduced in this campaign are the worst in the game and in most cases bugged af (insane spreads, terrible optics), on the Allied side we have fastest browning in the entire game which is ONE of the best rifles in the entire campaign, the A2 version is even better, those weapons are extremly good in Normandy but there it’s just a menace to deal with
- SMGs, i found most of them useless, i feel like best of them all is still Thompson there
- In case of sniper rifles, i feel much better using Allied Springfield M1903A3 compared to Japanese Arisaka
- Japan have better ATR rifle, Type 5 and Bazooka M1 are comparable
To summarize, they fucked up with proper balance of implemented automatic weapons for Axis side, there’s nothing like for example Beretta was for Axis in Tunisia (excellent SMG and it’s still good). Their implementation of Japanese vehicles is terrible and I don’t know why they choose this types, Ta-Se is inferior and bugged, crew can be sniped by small arms, Ha-Go is one of the worst vehicles in the game, Ke-Ni is a joke compared to M3 Stuart.
Why not for example make Ke-Ni vs M2A4 and Chi-Ha vs M3 Stuart?
I understand that Ha-Go was iconic but in real life it was far more effective than it’s in the game, they can’t implement all factors regarding this vehicle in the game, also for fuck sake a lot of vehicles in this game have locked MG’s using only 1 but for some reason M2A4 have ALL 5 AVAILABLE?!
Also why they’ve chosen A5M4 vs F2A-3 Buffalo not vs F2A-1 version or P-26?
They are not comparable aircrafts in the game, the equivalent of F2A-3 Buffalo in this game should A6M2-N version…
5 matches isn’t a good sample size for any metric tbh
5 Likes
How? Arisaka sniper is arguably the best in the game, tied with the carcano sniper. You get clip reloads, good iron sights, and a good scope (carcano scope is shorter but that’s situational)
Springfield is the worst imo because it has no iron sights and doesn’t take clips.
SPAAG differences are definitely huge, and the US uses their SPAAGs much more often.
Still doesn’t seem right that the Japanese 20mm struggles to pen the M13
2 Likes
Did you leave any matches ?
I often wounder if some of these Picks are misleading because there from players that quit if there going to lose?
1 Like
As i said i prefer Springfield, for me it has better scope, velocity and better feeling.
Also for my top sniper rifle i will also rate Carcano 7.35mm as the best in the game.
Oh fucking constantly lmfao
But its good shitpost material to use vs people who don’t think to ask that question
If a match looks like its not going to be fun I’ll leave 100%
But I’m going to keep these 100s until I get bored of messing about on the forum with it
6 Likes
O, ok, Ya i thought you mentioned you were a leaver in the past, no Judgement, it’s not something I ever do, but I totally get that people do that.
1 Like
Like if I got bonuses for staying and risking my sanity dragging blue enemies closer to victory than they’d ever be able to achieve, I’d be more inclined to stay.
But as it is
My fun > Blue Enemy
3 Likes
Well, they fucking do it to prove their point…that’s why only thing relatable right now is KDA in this game…
True, that’s why when im playing Pacific I usually dodge from 3 to 5 games before i’m able to defend atleast 1 point…
2 Likes
Good to see the KDAs in line with what I’ve been getting in the campaign.
Though right now I’ve focused on maxing one before going to the other side. Axis has been good to me so far.
Its hard at times, but still engaging and fun to run riot with Bayonetts fixed.
There are some distinct issues though. With map setup and points coupled with grey zone SPAAs and AA that have both contributed to higher deaths than in other campaigns and the few losses that I have incurred.
As well some equipment choices are clearly in favor of one faction over the other , but I will reserve that judgment for now until I play the allied side as much as I have Japan.
1 Like
This. It’s less about winning the match and more that I do not want to carry lazy snipers who sit in the back and don’t place any rallies. If the team is significantly worse than yourself and the other team there is zero reason to stick around.
3 Likes