Because it is a Tunisia German tank and all of those are inferior to the mighty AB!
Probably is a bug, maybe test it to see if you can get a Tier I with it to see if it is just the physical BR that is not appearing right or if it is broken and registered them as BR I.
lost my mortar crew -usa and my anti-tank piat crew was demoted from captain to sarge and why bother they still demoting players but a lot of banned players are back with new actts ya know their banned cos they get 100 kills as a pvt I wna know how you get one player has 10 tanks per game cos their doing some thing we cant like cheat ask doug or iii stakoe iii 11 t 34 same player kills 154 squad losses 0 oh mods don’t yu dare dete my posts u know their cheats –
The only thing i dislike is the silver gain in this update. Matchmaking could still see some improvements. But only 2k silver after almost a 30 minute battle? Can’t even buy a single G41 with this. Meaning the grind for xp has reduced, but the grind to purchase gear, especially high tier has gone up by quite a bit. Getting battle rewards and being in the top 3 should give a bonus to silver. As well as a victory bonus. From what i have seen, none of these are a thing as of right now
I started playing this game to play Stalingrad with the German Army. Now I only see in once every 12 games or so… Thinking about Bailing for good. Sick about filling in holes with XP on weapons I already have after it.
Win percentage in Normandy before merge: 66.52% (I play solo with random players)
Current Win percentage after Merge: 26.79%
All the lip service about “balance” and you completely destroyed the balance you already had.
The battles were extremely fun and balanced before the merge. You’d have to be extremely careful if you heard an MG42, the German planes had dogfighting superiority, and their tanks were always tough. But the infantry could be dealt with; their Kar98ks were bad for them in a direct, sustained firefight.
Now it’s nothing but anachronisms and inaccuracies. All of the MKb42s, MP43s, MP44s, and StG44s that were on the Eastern Front while Normandy was being invaded miraculously teleported to France.
[Note to the historians: yes, I know that the MP43/44 and the StG44 are the same rifle. Engineers intentionally misclassified it as a Machine Pistol so that the project would continue after the Angsty German Painter put a full halt to all rifle projects]
I only played Normandy and Pacific as Allies before the Merge. Normandy was pretty well balanced. Pacific was generally fun since it was usually an exercise in sniping bots trying to cross the water from a tower. It wasn’t the most exciting thing in the world, but it was really darn fun to play while Asia was asleep.
People were on the forums complaining about the balance of the game and I had no idea what the heck they were talking about. They must have been talking about different campaigns than I played but now I certainly know what they were on to. Having NEARLY ALL of the Axis troops drop into Normandy with (poorly modeled) MKb42s(THE DAMN THINGS JAM LIKE CRAZY IRL!!!) and late war assault rifles completely destroys the balance of the game and is extremely anachronistic. There were “more than a few” MKb42s spread across the Atlantic Wall but the way you have it modeled, the Normandy Coast was manned by the Wehrmacht’s best trained, best equipped troops. As history would note, Germany was caught on the Western Front with its pants down and we bent them over our knee like little bitches while the Russians turned the screws of the meat grinder in the East.
You guys have modeled the StG44 “sniper rifle” completely wrong. The StG44 was ineffective past 300m (German propaganda claimed 600m effectiveness, but a whole lot of dead Germans proved that to be a lie)
But you place it as one of the “top tier” weapons (which it was by WW2 standards) so you make it far more accurate than it ever was. A Garand against an StG44 ranged beyond 300m would be won by the Garand every day of the week and twice on the Sabbath.
What you like
the open grind for weapons that suit your playstyle best instead of linear grinding.
What you don’t like
-removing campaigns, i almost only played tunisia. that has been taken from me.
BALANCING as explained in the following
-mixed battles with battle ratings 1 and 3, it’s impossible to defend or attack or do anything for that matter against tier 3 as a tier 1 or sometimes even tier 2 player. it kills any enjoyment as your team is constantly being trampled.
You are easier off just instantly leaving the battle when you find yourself uptiered, leading to half empty lobbies.
constant grenade spamming being more widespread now that impact grenades have been lowered in battle rating.
Fighting against rank 3 soviets with rank 2 italian squads is a NIGHTMARE. there is hardly any good AT weaponry and the tank is useless against them.
What is not too easy to understand
leveling system for soldiers, i feel like the older version was overall better
Overall i massively dislike this patch, i like the new non linear grind sure but even the old leveling system was just fine with me.
but other then that it’s been a massive dissapointment and do not see myself enjoying this game like i used to.
It’s been a massive turn off for me and playing matches hardly brings any enjoyment anymore. Bring back campaign maps at the very least.
What you like
1- That you can play all maps.
2- Selection of weapons, troops and vehicles
3- Support-Team
4- Bugfix
…
What you don’t like
1 -Matchmaiking.
2- That you have to buy new clothes for each card.
3- You should be able to decide what clothes the soldiers wear, regardless of the battlefield.
4- That you can’t buy camouflage for gold vehicles.
5- Many tanks don’t have zoom or MG
…
What is not too easy to understand
1- You should be able to choose where you want to fight. (Example: I just want to play D-Day card and matchmaking will do the rest).
2- There is too much Berlin, Moscow, Stalingrad in matchmaking