Since we don’t have the Australian army can we have at least every Year rotational battle passes that will repeat so you can collect full Australian army. So after 4 years the first battle pass will repeat. Sometimes there can be new event squads introduced that you can earn or an old event squad can return. I think this way Anzac day will be much more fun.
Battle Pass Year 1:
Battle Pass Year 2:
Battle Pass Year 3:
Battle Pass Year 4:
Battle Pass Year 5:
Battle Pass Year 6:
Battle Pass Year 7:
Battle Pass Year 8:
Battle Pass Year 9:
Battle Pass Year 10:
Also during Anzac day you will be able to earn old event squads like :
And buy Australian Squads with discount:
15 Likes
STRAYA C##T!!!
would make my day
PS: Also Boomerag needs BR lowered!!! justice for boomerang!!
3 Likes
Yeah Boomerang must be BR II :
They are BR II planes…so how Zero can be BR II but boomerang br III xD
2 Likes
Aussie! Aussie! Aussie! Thank you for mentioning Australia.
While I agree with some of these I dont see why Australia cant be featured more in the tech tree.
For starters the slouch hat/digger hat and Lemon Squeezer (New Zealand hat) should be free customisation options.
As I always say the British Army peaked cap from the Sten Mk III premium squad was made freely available so theres no reason the same cant happen for the Australian/New Zealand premium/event squads.
The P14 sniper in my opinion should be tech tree as a British-Commonwealth option beyond the Springfield.
Id even consider the Austen to add more variety for low rank SMGs.
But overall yes we should definitely get an ANZAC Day event
1 Like
Why did you compare a fighter and a bomber, the boomerang has 2 20mm 4 7 mm and ,2 250 kg bombs while the zero has to 60kg bombs 2 20mm and 2 7 mm yep that’s the same br to me as well. If you want the boomerang to be br2 compare it to one or more br2 attackers. Also the boomerang has more 7mm ammo 4000 rounds to the zeros 1300.
Second the prototype Owen in the picture is 22 caliber long or short that would be at best a very bad br1 or br zero smh
??..boomerang is a fighter.
My bad but my point remains the boomerang far out classes the zero in terms of weapons acting as a fighter and an attacker. If you want it at br2 it needs to loose the bombs, I am sure the zero is far more agile, but the boomerang already has more bullets and guns.
theres not much difference between 2x60kg bombs and 2x100 kg bombs (british bombs).
Hurricane at BR 1 has the same bombs as the boomerang
Yak 1 and Lagg 3-11 has 2x100kg bombs at BR1
All the 109s carry combined 200KGs BR 1 and BR 2
Sorry read it as 2 250 kg bombs darn them for making me do math and it’s 115 kg. Second the boomerang has 4 7mm guns and 4000 rounds to the zeros 2 7mm and 1400. And before you say but 7mm is weak many pilots used them to calculate range windage ect. I am sure you would be more the happy to loose them. That is take 2 from the boomerang or remove the altogether from both planes. The problem is too few br ranks the boomerang is to strong for br2 but too weak for br3.
When It comes to planes you cant just look at the weapons. its like a trade off. The zero trades off 2 Machine guns and slightly smaller bombs for better performance. Its far more manueverable than the Boomerang which really pays off in a dog fight. Pays off way more than the 2 mgs its missing.
That and Zero isnt the only comparison. The big picture is, when all the fighters are looked at In BR 1 and 2, their power level is about the same.
and just for interest, Warthunder, A game that has had 13 years to suss out power level of planes especially, rates the Zero Above the Boomerang. For pretty good reason.
1 Like
Wow you can kill infantry in warthunder. No there not the same game, yes I am sure the zero is a real tank able to take far more damage than the fragile boomerang.
and? they both have “SMALL” bombs that will do Minimal damage to infantry Because the radius is 40cms different (the Zero bombs have far more bomb fragments to kill infantry). Guns are pretty irrelevant to kill infanty (especially 7mm) because you cant see anything (small render distance)…if you strafe something, it was blind.
You have a bomb twice as heavy but only covers an area 10 percent bigger, yep math checks
Its not my maths, Im just reading back to you whats publicly available.
weight doesnt = explosive filler
Yes 23 is not smaller than 31 good math, so why are the ausies using tnt if Japan is not
no one said it was
google it. why does anyone use anything different to another country?
For naval AP shells, the US used something known simply as Explosive D. This was somewhat less powerful than TNT, but it was virtually immune to premature detonation, and it didn’t readily cook off. Other navies used TNT, sometimes mixed with wax or something else to keep it stable. The Japanese used TNA, which is more powerful than TNT, but also more sensistive. As a result their shells had a large cavity but much of it was filled with cushioning. They would have done better to use something less powerful and fill the entire cavity.
At the war’s start, most torpedoes used TNT. The Japanese used Type 97 explosive (60% TNT, 40% HND) which was about 7% more powerful than pure TNT. The German also used TNT-HND mixtures but with aluminum and Am nitrate. In 1942, the British developed Torpex; this entered service with the Americans as well by 1943. Torpex is rated as 50-100% more powerful than TNT.
TNA is very similar to Type 97 used late in the war in the type 98 bomb. It was toxic and more prone to self-detonation. This is what i hate about Enlisted it uses perfect versions of weapons that never existed. The Ausies used TNT as not to kill bomb makers or the ground crew. But in the game yes a 50KG bomb with Type 97 is equal to a 100KG TNT bomb you suck.
Can Finland be done like this too?
…its clearly written above.
60 kg bomb with 25.3 kgs TNT equivalent
115 kg bomb with 30.7 kgs TNT.
The Boomerang outclasses the Zero???
Please tell me I read that wrong.
Because if I didnt read it wrong Id go so far as to say thats quite disrespectful towards the RAAF veterans who lost their lives.
The Boomerang was a good ground attack aircraft, but was NO MATCH for the Zero AT ALL. The CAC Boomerang is the one type of Boomerang that rarely comes back.
As a fighter, it sucked.
The Boomerang and the Wirraway were desperate measures of a nation under attack with literally no alternatives.
We found uses for them but the idea that they are capable aeroplanes in Enlisted and War Thunder is beyond laughable.
3 Likes
