thought i play a quick game, load in and hit TAB to see what’s going on. Yep that is a big NO! Left right away
7 Likes
Nothing new 
4 Likes
4 Likes
This is not about number of players, this about community doesn’t like to lose.
4 Likes
All good allies player are pew,pew axis bot in tunisia…
Where were those allies guys 2 months ago? 
1 Like
No it’s about me not wasting my time on a game I have no way of winning.
There is not even a 1% chance of me pulling something off
1 Like
I sure hope the big update fixes the broken matchmaking. It’s a joke at this point.
1 Like
The community abuses the rules and gathers in one team to farming. This is one of the glaring flaws of the game.
4 Likes
I think Normandy and some Moscow are the most balanced. Pacific and Tunisia are crap shows
4 Likes
1 Like
Normandy and Moscow seem to have many players.
Looking at the statistics, one can assume that a larger number of players is less likely to result in a one-sided matchmaking.
The rework that Darkflow is currently working on will remove campaigns and consolidate the player base, so the imbalance in matching may improve a bit. 
… But when I see people saying that matching will be normal if there are more people, I can’t help but think back to the Normandy Allied disaster last winter.
At that time, the Allied forces in Normandy were just like the Axis in Tunisia and the Allied forces in the Pacific.
In my opinion,It seems to me that even if the player base is merged, players who want to farm will continue to flock to the teams that are crowded at the time. 
3 Likes
20% of players desert.
cant say much about playerbase cause we are split over 6 servers (3 crossplay off, 3 crossplay on) and determine who plays where, i need to reverse search by known players on that server and problem is people who play on multiple servers pollute the result.
1 Like
surprisingly pacific is actually more balanced than moscow with actual player distribution. it is probably just that allied players suck.
4 Likes
It’s because most of them are newbies, and Axis players are taking advantage of that to farm wins. It was the same situation in Normandy last year, now things have evened out.
Same thing with Tunisia Allies to an extent.
1 Like
I am Japanese, but many people in the Japanese player only play Japanese forces. With them as the nucleus, there are still many people who want to fight on a superior team, and they will gather in large numbers in the Japanese Army.
In contrast, the US in the Pacific will probably attract a lot of beginners.
Tunisia is a PVE, but the Pacific is where veterans abuse beginners.
1 Like
normandy allies last year was mostly populated by console players from my experience… played both axis and allies at that time.
1 Like
Yeah that sounds about right. I don’t know for sure though
I see japanese player using almost only BA,type 5 and type96, no tank or plane, i cant call this an abuse, there is no disparity in the equipment
That’s a good way of explaining it.
Tunisia Axis is a nightmare because no one plays it, so it’s just a bot hunting party.
Pacific Allies is a nightmare because it’s veteran Axis players vs. newbies.
Matchmaking will probably help out Pacific Allies since there will be 3 queues merging together and they’ll probably get access to some new stuff. Tunisia Axis I’m not so sure, if no one plays it now I doubt that will change after matchmaking comes out. But at least people won’t be able to abuse it to farm wins anymore.
2 Likes