Personally I wont. Matchmaking rarely make a balanced game. Grinding is way too heavy even for someone with the premium account. Premium squads are way to expensive cost of one premium squad is enough to buy a good game on steam. And yea, since I am a chinese the chinese server is really another reason to leave a bad rating
My review:
But I still hope that they will fix some things (add low BR paratroopers for Axis).
Not ready to rate it. Potential is there, will recommend gladly once it taps into it more.
Dont get me wrong i love it…and am willing to ignore the parts that desperately need to be changed until they happen…but my mates arent, and their reasons are understandable.
I wont recommend they try it again until its ready for a second chance (cos if they hate it a second time, thats it). But i wont bash it in a review either…
will just wait…patiently.
I will leave no rating because I don’t care
I would give Enlisted positive review, but I am simply too lazy to make review on steam. Especially since steam reviews are so irrelevant since review bombing is a thing.
I will. Because if I don’t it would definitely mean I’m either stupid, or crazy… since I play regularly.
Enlisted is fun. It got it’s shortcomings (like ridiculous business model, way too pricy premiums etc), but it’s constantly being worked on. Devs pump a serious amount of content often compared to other games. It’s entertaining.
It’s fun.
Knowing this, yes I recommend, while being honest about the caveats.
Or at the very lest, I won’t negative review.
Yeah, I would.
Coming over from Easy Red 2, it’s like that, but with a multiplayer schematic.
It also runs perfectly on my system (at minimum, also given how long Easy Anti-Cheat runs on my Operating System).
60-80 frames per second.
Oh, and network optimisation, too.
Playing from remote Australia doesn’t feel like the game’s force-teleporting you to get killed when you have 600+ ping.
My review:
Everyone this game has extreme potential, please download this game and take to the forum! Our demands are not being met, our Prophet @wastedwoodsman (praise be his name) is being unrightfully banned and the current match making system will tear you to pieces.
Everyone make an account on the in game forum and change your nickname to “Richard Dick Thatch” the 1st through 1,000,000th, and make this your profile picture:
We need as many people as possible to spread the word! Hop on the forum and copy paste these 4 posts:
Post 1: Make BR-1 through BR-5 separate queues.
We new players are being torn to pieces by seal clubbers with automatic weapons, high explosive ordnance, and heavily armoured self propelled guns. We will leave if you do not correct this immediately!
Add a reserve queue for us until we research all of Tier 1 before throwing us at the seal clubbers, thank you for your time.
Post 2: Free @wastedwoodsman + Colt Monitors for US Riflemen.
It has come to my attention that a notable figure in Enlisted history has been banned after being baited into a argument that ultimately led to his ban.
We are demanding justice for @wastedwoodsman and as compensation were suggesting that the BAR Crusade finally become a reality by adding the Premium Colt Monitor to the Non-Premium US tech tree as a BR-5 Automatic-Rifle since it’s very similar to Germany’s FG-42 II.
Post 3: Double all XP gained for all users
The XP gain in this game is slower than a snail, we new players might be willing to try the Premium Account option if it granted 4X more XP, otherwise we’ll be returning to Call of Duty.
Post 4: Add MG-42 with 150 Round belt to Germany.
It has come to my attention that a very controversial user on the fourm known as @Greyparrots has been suggesting that Germany get a 150 Round MG-42 for quite some time, it’s ridiculous that Germany is the only faction without a 100+ Round Machine Gun.
Thank you for your contribution, spread the word and we’ll achieve our goals, if you need my help you can message me on the fourm @WarFrog_935
annd which ones?
- Improve balance by adding low BR paratroopers for Axis (Germany)
- Add premium paratroopers for Japan
- Replace PaK-40 of Soviets with a historical ZiS-3 and ZiS-2
All rest is OK
I’m neutral. The game has potential but imo wastes it on being f2p CoD. Some may like it, I don’t.
We have something in the works about that, but it’s a long way to go for now
We’ll see what i can suggest/provide to devs, but not gonna promise anything here
Hey, James. Can you please ask devs for which reason is Chi-Nu on BR4?
I would really love to know answer.
Too unpolished to give a rating.
Since your take note:
I will give it negative till they fix the Bipods and inconsistent HE shells and machineguns.
Also by playing new BR5 of Japan i have added yet another reason for separate que of BR5 from BR3-4, BR5 is so insanely powerful that with your bolt rifles and mediocre smgs/lmgs you can’t compete against them. Add even more powerful tanks and planes spamming bombs/rockets every 1min and you have complete unplayable matches.
I would, though a couple of things are hindering me from doing so:
-
No chat system, you can’t communicate with the people on your friend list
-
No functioning bipods, its a meme that bipods still don’t really work.
-
BRs are not working, we need ±1 BR or a complete overhaul.
Im confused by this. Germany already has paratroopers with BR II equipment (OG-43 is arguably BR 1). Why are they still being left at BR IV? And why did they not get dynamic crate update with the rest of them to help them?
They have the worst crate equipment of any patatrooper. Flamers could have easily been part of the dynamic crate
Matchmaking is just abysmal currently. It actually made me resentful and salty against the game. I kind of stopped playing because it just makes me sad - 90% of the time it’s either “you can take a plane and fly and circles and still win anyway” or “no matter what you do it’s a loss as your team is just non-existent”
And it pisses me off to no end, because the game can be brilliant when the matches are even and interesting