Will there be a system change from BR +2 -2 to +1 -1?

Suggestions
1

Will there be a system change from BR +2 -2 to +1 -1?
Because as on WarThunder

10 Likes
2

I pray that never happens

We need LESS WT in my Enlisted, not more

3

I don’t particularly agree, as I refuse to touch BR3 because it’s cancer.

2 Likes
4

I love US III. Deleting Tiger II’s with my M9 or 500lb-1000lb bombs. Deleting an StG squad with my BAR. Showing some Krauts what’s good with the Thompson. Man it’s great

5

As Germany 3 I just get blown to smithereens in BR V. I never get low BR. On the US side I constantly see downtiered BR3 vehicles.
It’s just sucked.

4 Likes
6

I’d be playing BR3 a lot more if it wasn’t set up the way it is. It has so much iconic weapons I’d enjoy using

4 Likes
7

That’s a playerbase issue. Not a BR issue. Germany has no players

1 Like
8

The br 3 is huge problem. New players should not have to face kv 1s or long barrel panzer 4s with their t1 tank

5 Likes
9

Yeah, literally everyone except @TheUnclaimedOne do not like BR3 the way it is currently.

It’s obvious MM policy needs to change.

12 Likes
10

I like Enlisted. Not War Thunder: Infantry Edition

11

That’s why we need ±0 BR MM. To avoid any similarity with WT.

6 Likes
12

Kind of unrelated but I’m getting really annoyed that I want to use literally one BR3 weapon and this will cause me to be considered equal to BR3. Not to mention potential fighting vs BR5.

2 Likes
13

Almost all of those things are US high “end” stuff.

14

All of those things are BR III buddro

High end is M1919A6, M2 Carbine, Drum Thompson, and P-47

15

No shit.

But there is no other Bazooka beyond M9 so not really hard to not use a different bazooka beyond M9.
BARs and Johnsons are about the same except Johnsons shoots a bit faster. M1919 is sometimes not preferred by vets for whatever reason, probably due to movement penalty.
Thompsons are are equally trash apart from the M1921 with grip but only because it has kinda better dispersion. 50 Drum aint make it really better.
Most US attackers use 250kg if they have bombs as well as the P-51 D-5. Only SBD or so use 500kg which is BRII.

You didnt mention plane rockets and those already appear in BRII and HVAR at BRIII. Also, the M2 isnt a Assaulter weapon so you cant really replace it in lower BR with Thompsons and BARs.

3 Likes
16

I’m still debating which one I prefer

Our bombs are not measured in French units

No I did not. Partly because while I love abusing infantry with rocket spam, I prefer to bomb tanks

17

I love BR3 right now because it’s both viable against BR5 (unlike BR1 vs BR3) and all of the iconic WW2 stuff is on BR3, which works almost for every map without cringing.

  • T-34
  • KV-1
  • PPSh-41
  • SVT
  • DP-27
  • Garand
  • Thompson
  • BAR
  • Sherman
  • Mustang
  • Gewehr 41
  • MG-34
  • Hanomag 251/9
  • Pz IV long barrel
  • Stug 3
  • Stuka
  • BF-109
  • MP-40 is BR2 but still works fine
18

From ALL the things that could make Enlisted more War Thunder-like, I think changes to the matchmaker should be least of your concerns…

4 Likes
19

I dont care. Makes too much fun.

And you cant kill tanks with rockets I guess.

21

It’s less reliable. You need direct impacts, and then you sometimes need multiple. Plus, my friend already runs rockets. Between his 4 HVAR’s and my 2 500lb’ers, we’re basically a budget P-47 at BR III