Trying to make a good ww1 using enlisted logic would be impossible especially seeing as there are games that do the WW1 theater better. (EG, BF1, Isonzo, ect ect)
The only thing they would have to add are jets and some tanks which are already in warthunder.
They come
impossible to make it ww1 ? how? we already have weapons for it in many cases just need maps and correct tanks,MGs,vehicles, AT guns etc… this game will probably include multiple eras of wars in the future so why would they limit themselves? even if there are other games that are from bigger companies like EA that doesn’t mean that enlisted can’t include such time settings as well
I think he mean the game is to fast paced for emulate the trench warfare, but if we forget about that, yes it can be done
(Cap the point noob)
Trench warfare is not suited for Enlisted. The bots are to stupid to use it, and most people run and gun.
actually imho bf1 and isonzo are more fast paced than enlisted , i would say enlisted is on level of game called verdun
Ah yes, muzzleloaders.
Anglo-zulu wars would be the first assimetrical campaign of the game, before the aussie-emu wars of course
WHY STOP AT THIS?
There is potential in this game Iam telling you
not all ww1 was in trenches but yes there was many, but the bot AI was said by devs they trying to improve them so let us wait and see perhaps there will be variaty of different orders and the both path finding becomes better and as we know ww1 was majority bolt actions but i don’t think enlisted will respect that so prepare for mp18s and BARs if they do add it
If they did that then the maps should be made MUCH bigger.
Who will win
Conviction that triangle bayonet wound is unposible to stitched is folse;]
These are in works already according to one of the leaks of the sikrit dokuments of Gaijin
seems legit
WHAT SWORD IS BETTER???