There is little point to compare thing with 99% of inaccuracies and 100% of inaccuracies. Both are ridiculous. One idea is little bit less ridiculous than other idea doesn’t mean that idea is good.
It is one thing to ask for something appear within the time it was in service, compared to asking for something when it wasn’t in service. We aren’t asking for these to appear in the Korean War or the Vietnam War. We are saying it is plausible for something to appear in a Battle that happened during a year in which that something was in service by the military. Providing arbitrary percentages that have no basis in anything is not disproving this.
This is why those tanks should not appear in Moscow. Using the IPhone comparison again, you can’t own a IPhone 17, as they will not be out until around 2024, you however CAN own a 1st generation IPhone, despite them coming out in 2007.
2 Likes
Soviets were desperate like giving one guy a gun and the other ammo
Different thing but both are ridiculous. Plausible to appear doesn’t mean it should appear. If non existent is 100% inaccuracies. The t26 tank not being used in battle of Berlin is 99% inaccuracies.
It is still in service that time literally means nothing. It is not there in Berlin.
I wonder why Us army won’t use Sherman nowadays.
May be true in Moscow, but not in Berlin.
If the Soviets were never desperate why did they buy lend lease
Because it is outdated, also, the M4 Sherman was in service until 1957, so it was in use during the Korean War. Luckily for us, we aren’t playing a modern warfare game, we are playing a World War II, discussing a battle that occurred in 1945 and tanks that were in service during 1945. If the tanks you listed were out of service in 1943, then sure. We should not include them in the Battle of Berlin.
We are talking about situation in Berlin Lol.
Berlin campaign has lend lease plane and tank in it, so yeah desperate
Not desperate enough to use obsolete early war tank Lol.
Then don’t use them? It is still plausible for them to be used if other players desired to.
They should stay in early war campaigns.
And that’s your opinion on the matter. You initial statement was that it was inaccurate for them to appear. It is not inaccurate.
Give me evidence of t26 been use in battle of Berlin. Or else I can simply say Jumbo is accurate since it already exist in USA during battle of Normandy.
Again, most players are upset with anachronistic weapons and vehicles. I’ve already presented pictures showing that it is plausible. I’m not going to scour the web to find an OOB regarding the Battle of Berlin to make a comparison to a video game that already allows you to select your loadouts and choose weapons which should also not be anachronistic to the setting.
Well, if you admit that they are fine with being in every battle starting up until the “summer of 1944” then I will admit defeat with them being in Berlin, alongside any battle starting in 1945 or anything past summer in 1944.
There is still a major problem, its counterpart the panzer 3e already been withdrawn from service after 1941.
So there is no counterpart that is historically accurate to meet on late war campaign.
Many other early war vehicle are facing the same problem.
So? Most people would already have better equipment. I assume the only reason why they would go with that would be the same reason some people equip the Berdan II.