Look nobody wants to play a reenactment, but just because something isn’t 100% historically accurate doesn’t mean we should allow IS 2 in Moscow
3 Likes
He’s not intelligent enough to understand nuance, best to just ignore him.
1 Like
And the only thing you can do is insult people , rather than providing me a valid point. You provide zero point on all the replies to me.
So you have double standards? Both are historically inaccurate but you just don’t like Is 2 in Moscow but you like pz2 in Berlin. Either keep the history accuracy or just abandon it. The fake historical accuracy you are talking about is just as ridiculous as using Is2 in Moscow.
ok sped.
1 Like
Lol you said you want to ignore me , but you are the one who keeps replying to me.
No more RB bulls***
Even if history has something weaker but later. Just reduce RPs.
RB is completely artificial AND variable to balance.
One exists and would’ve been used if they were on hand, the other literally did not exist at the time between 30 September 1941 – 7 January 1942. Learn to understand nuance before emberassing yourself further.
Lol the most important thing is if it is used in that battle. Do you want to use bow and arrow in Berlin? It clearly exists during that time. Many people are complaining about Jumbo and T50, since they are not been used in the campaign where they are currently at.
Point to where I said that, I guarantee that you have no idea what you’re talking about once more.
I literally just said ‘‘wouldve been used if they were on hand’’ given how desperate the situation was in berlin, retard. Thank you for proving me right in my suspicion that you might also lack any basic reading comprehension. You’re a waste of oxygen.
And for the Soviet? They are not desperate. Will they use bow and arrow too? You can argue about using early war tank by saying Germany is desperate, but the Soviet are not.
The Federov automatic, a much hated WWI op weapon by players, first entered mass production in 1916
Nobody was talking about the Soviets.
So you use Is2 to counter pz2? There is an equipment based matchmaking. If you are using pz2 you will be facing t60 or t26.
It is not “double standards”. Mosin Nagants are still used in some conflicts that are happening TODAY. They aren’t pulling weapons that are created 20 years in the future out of their asses to use. The main issue most people have is that something is not yet invented, should not appear in the campaign before it’s usage. The IS-2 shouldn’t be in the Battle of Moscow for the same reason you don’t own an IPhone 17.
2 Likes
I am not talking about weapons like Mosin nagant that are already in Berlin. I am talking about vehicle like t26 that is obsolete shouldn’t in Berlin. Those equipment are not used in Battle of Berlin. t26 shouldn’t be in the battle of Berlin for the same reason as Us army won’t use Sherman tank to fight enemy nowadays.
Technically speaking, the T-26 wasn’t even phased out until after the war. Last time being used during the attack on Manchuria in 1945.
That is more reasonable, but I think the difference is that it wouldn’t theoretically be impossible to see those older vehicles, especially as both the T-26 and the Panzer II were both in service for the whole duration of the war. It simply wouldn’t be the best idea to utilize them in the Battle of Berlin, not something inaccurate. In comparison, it is physically impossible for an IS-2 to appear in the Battle of Moscow.
Still didn’t participate in Battle of Berlin. T26 is already obsolete against German tank. I don’t care if it is been used in Manchuria or not.