Why does this game have "No Win and No Lose" games 75% of the time?

I have now been playing for about 20 - 25 days.
I have come to see that for whatever reason this game has coded that it SHALL be you can not win (no matter what) and you can not lose (no matter what) for 75% of the games.

Is it the BOTs? Is the AI so much of the game that is dilutes the players to insignificance???

This demands that reasonable player “desert” when they are in a “No Win” game and move on to the next game to grind out the XP.

I have been correct 95% of the time in predicting a “No Win” game. I am the “Estimator” (hear that with an Arnold voice and accent).

Suggestion: Perhaps limit the AI players to only 20% of the players? And, balance the ranks of the human players to each team.
Fix it!
Balance what ever needs to be done. I am not a coder.

6 Likes

You are correct, good sir.

2 Likes

My guess is its the same thing that a lot of games do anymore and they try to keep the player win-rate no higher than around 60% and no lower than 40%.

As far as this goes, it would require more human players than what the game currently has. It would be nice in some cases to have more players, but that usually isn’t the case. Playing more casual/ relaxed games against a lot of bots isn’t always a bad thing either. Perhaps a more dedicated “ranked” mode could be implemented for the players that want full teams of players?

They are getting there. These devs crank out far more updates than almost any other game i’ve played, they listen to their community a LOT, and they are pretty good about transparency. They’ll fix the issues, they just need some more time.

Take a look back through their “News” topics, you’ll see what I mean. You haven’t been around long enough to really see the different implementations, those will give you a better picture.

It isn’t entirely because of bots, but yes it’s down to player distribution. There are no checks in place to promote even matches and a whole bunch of incentives for people to actively break the balance as much as possible.

Even when you do get a rare battle that could go either way, it won’t be a test of skill that decides the outcome but rather a test of who quits first. It’s been this way since release. They either don’t care to fix the issue or can’t.

For me it’s basically if my team don’t know how to rush the objectives we gonna lose and the other way around, since I couldn’t stop rushing team no matter what.

Same like in War Thunder, they dont care 4 the rigged games.

Why can I NOT start a new topic?

I just bought a Tiger E on Battle of Berlin in Logistics for a golden ticket thingy. But it is unusable. Neither of my tank crews/squads can use it. I am at level 7, yep . . .pay to win.

Can’t find any relevant info on this issue of the Tiger E and compatible squad.

Because you are a “base user” you are limited once you reach the “member” level