BR III match with Japan. Stomps are just plain unenjoyable for both teams - I’ve been on both ends and know how it feels. When you lose, you feel like giving up and uninstalling for good. When you win, you also feel the same, as there’s no time for you to literally do anything in a match.
I’m going to continue posting these sorts of games until someone listens about changing the matchmaking. I don’t care whether it’s skill based, separating solo queues from stacks, or even improving the tutorial. All I know is something needs to change.
looks like its console players vs pc players i also think its unfair to use Japan in this case since its player base is more skilled vs allies players at the lower tiers since thats where all the fun is at in Japan
I actually didn’t notice that until now. But console players aren’t always as bad as people make them out to be. I’ve been on teams where console players have outdone me.
It’s sort of just an Axis thing. The Axis sides tend to have weaker weapons, so we need to be more skillful and tactically aware (although not always the case). Allies on the other hand have the stronger weapons, so they can be a bit more careless when it comes to tactics (also not always the case).
It’s really hard to make generalisations, as each match is different in Enlisted. Just a couple months ago Japan and Germany were the sides to avoid, now it’s flipped around.
(I play with Join Any Faction on 24/7 so it’s not like I get a choice . . . )
Nah Germany still sucks, i lose more matches than as Soviets at BR3. BR3 Axis players only knows how to spam tanks and planes, once you shut them down they are completely defenceless, few weeks ago we had many apc/rally spammers but now they are gone from most matches (no event no good players?). Japan is now really powerful at BR3 and BR5. However they suffer vs Sherman spammers as their tanks don’t have enough pen, and ofc at BR5 they suffer vs op american planes.
Interesting. I lose more matches as Soviets at BR III. Although, my experience may be different to yours because I play on all servers (Europe, Eastern Europe and North America) since ping is about the same from either. Again, back to my original point, factions are inconsistent.
This shouldn’t be the case. Most players should place down rallies. I reckon they should have a kick function similar to inactivity - if you haven’t stepped foot on the objective by the second capture or built a rally for the first objective - you get kicked. It promotes teamplay.
Well past couple of matches I played, they were pretty useless. I was able to flank them and take them out pretty easy, which was a nice change. Most times the 105 is in the kill feed, it’s basically game over. Unless you have a competent team that works together.
Yeah the Gewehr 41 is a little rough. Still better (arguably) than the Type 4. It needs the reload changed to Johnson Rifle speed or slightly slower, and the Gewehr 43 brought down.
My reasoning is the Gewehr 43 can do 12.0 damage and have a reload nerf to bring it more in line with the SVTs, and the Gewehr 41 can do 12.4 - 12.7 damage in exchange for longer reload and less accuracy.
Although preferably the Gewehr 41 just gets a reload, recoil and accuracy buff (pretty much most semi autos across the board require this) and the Gewehr 43 stays where it is.
