Which campaign as has more "Axis as attacker" map

Mess Room
1

i just finished normandy as axis and most the time i become the defender and that’s just sucks

for next campaign i prefer to play more as attacker side instead. so which one, Axis Moscow or Axis Belin?

2

Moscow the two side have the same ammount of attack and defense

1 Like
3

normandy and berlin for the majority, are defending. due to historical reasons.

if you don’t like defending, than moscow might be your choise.

there are more maps where germans attack.

Unlike normandy that has only 3/2 maps, and berlin that only has 2 maps.

4

I believe due to game mechanisms it’s always harder to win as defenders than as attackers. Defenders usually have to kill 200-300 enemies more than attackers to win, at least in Normandie. Because capturing an objective is too easy compared with defending one.
In Normandie every cap gives american about 250 tickets or even more. That’s why it’s so hard to win.

1 Like
5

Not really, it’s just that, like it or not, tanks and CAS play a major role, especially in Normandy. The side that gains air superiority AND deploys good tankers usually wins, by disrupting all enemy reinforcements waves before they can get to the obj in numbers.

3 Likes
6

Moscow has more GE on offensive, but it’s pretty harsh, and hard to push vs SU there.

But - you can always just exit and start another map. Soon enough, you’ll land something offensive. But I agree, that’s crap. I have maxxed GE side on Normandy, and it’s always defense.

7

Yes. In Normandie sometimes CASs do 40%-60% of total kills

8

Moscow is the best and the most balanced of all campaign in term of defender-attacker role IMO.

1 Like
9

It’s way too quick to cap and the attackers get their spawns too close. I would like more drawn out firefights.