When would we have Ak47 for br5's ussr Rifleman

False, the AK47 was not mass produced until the stamped receiver process was finished and finalized.

There are THREE types in the “AK47” before the AKM.

The AS44 and its variants/types are MORE than enough for the game. This game is going to stay WW2. prototypes and paper items in the timeframe of WW1&2 are slightly acceptable based on what it is and where it will be used. If 2 years post war will be allowed, the game would be broken after this “post-war” addition.

1 Like

:joy::joy::joy::joy: it’s June so I guess it’s June fools day

1 Like

download (9)
William-Adolphe Bouguereau
Disdain, 1850

Soviets don’t “need” anything. They’re already clones of axis, or better.

Also (almost) ALL Soviets weapons are powerful, large capacity automatics :laughing:

9 Likes

But it’s already broken since Tiger 2 is allowed in Stalingrad and Rzhev, and T20 with AS are not g.o., not premium, but fully accessible to every John Doe and Ivan.

yes, lets add a French faction and give it a Famas.

much WW2 very wow.

1 Like

But we already have ak47, rpd, and more 100mm tanks around?

What else do you want? T-55?

2 Likes

The boos “need” is3 :smirk:

1 Like

And then they will “need” something else, like always.

I am content with what I have, t-34-100 was what the faction needed. IS2 is ‘wonky’.

1 Like

In truth it didn’t need t34100 either (even thought it’s a fun addition), at all. Is2 1944 is a beast if used well.

Problem is, most Enlisted tankers… are soooo bad! They see their targets and immediately stop like a deer in front of a car. They don’t use cover. All they see is “uuuuuuuh KTH has shorter reload time, the suffering!”

I like the Is2 1944. That giant boat is ridiculously nimble for a heavy tank, it shoots mini nukes and can take out anything it faces. Even kth.

It’s true most tankers in Enlisted never tried WT, or even world of tonks, I suppose…

3 Likes

More like most tanker arent determine enough to stick with the game (kinda like how i was in warthunder i guess since i didnt even reach the tiger there)

True, all of it.

I don’t loathe IS2, I just preferably don’t want to use it as much.

I always used SU-100 or any soviet tank with 100mm gun. This is my preference, from war thunder to world of tanks too.

2 Likes

Oooh I forgot the H&G Soviet death star gun :laughing:

Best spot was in the police station map, both side of the river with the ruined bridge. There was a big hill on both sides… you could snipe all day long and see poor axis ragdolls flying :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

I don’t like IS-2 for simple reason.

Reload time of IS-2 is just way too long for me personally. I am extremely impatient.

1 Like

no

1 Like

you won me over
remove the Tiger 2 from Stalingrad and Rzhev
what does this have to do with the T-20 prototype’s existed back than it was part of an entire family of them

find a gun no matter how op that firs the era that is before the end of the war and people will support you
hell in the cold war they had nuclear bullets
not bombs but crazy idea
you might as well ask for m16’s

I truly disagree with that, to say that the game is broken because a possibility of a tiger to being in Stalingrad is not the equivalent of adding equipment or things that were not related in the era.

I understand exactly what you were saying and I agree, it is frustrating that tiger is installing, I don’t think people are disagreeing with that statement. I believe that Stalingrad campaign should be moved to BR I-III.

But adding weapons and equipment that were from two years or even up to five years post, World War II would completely ruin the authenticity and the cohesion of the games, environment, cosmetics, Tory, campaign system/maps And the player count based on the game. If people wanted to play a World War II game that had less relative historical accuracy, they would truly be playing battlefield five or call of duty Vanguard.

Again, if post World War II equipment was to be added in this game, the Soviets would not be receiving much Other than what they had up until 1949, while the allies, such as the Americans and British would be receiving an insane amount of weapons and equipment. Not to mention that the Japanese absolutely did not have any equipment post World War II, nor did Germany. ( The germans and Japanese only had equipment post war, because there were allied interventions. The US rebuilt, the German military, as well as the Japanese Homeland because we were occupying those nations.)

1 Like

I agree, most tankers that I either play against or play with always seem to get stuck in a tunnel vision effect. They are not looking at the bigger picture of what their equipment should be providing for their team.

1 Like

Well that’s exactly what we have now already:

  • Hori never used, never adopted, never built in metal by most accounts
  • T-34-100 a couple prototypes made, not approved for or production
  • AS-44 never used in WW2
  • RD-44 never used in WW2
  • T20 never used in WW2
  • Fedorov Avtomat never used after winter war
  • Fedorov MG single prototype build in the 20s
  • Stalingrad 1942-43 on high BR
  • Rzhev 1942-43 on high BR

The authenticity is already ruined and all the Devs do is continue intentionally ruining it (by doing stuff like Rzhev high BR) without a single step in the WW2 direction.

Okay, but can you please spamming?

You are literally just Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V at this point.

1 Like

do you not understand the rule, the only requirement is only that a prototype existed before the end of the war, before the end why do you bring up war use and production,

my weapon was just put on paper in 46 but because your weapon was only a prototype my weapon should be used

1945 that is the issue this is a WW2 game

1 Like