sure the AK47 can join the RPG-1 And RPG-2
Yes I also demand Tsar Tank BR5 to storm Berlin
It was built just like T-34-100.
And it is absolutely necessary to add Vickers Independent and Grosskampfwagen for Battle of Normandy
Both developed before 1945.
Finally we will reach a good WW2 game status by then.
2 Likes
ok i have mine
the point is not that all pre 1945 weapons must be included just that when Japan surrenders and WW2 ends if you could not have touched it you cannot have it
we are fighting ww2 with weapon’s you could have used
actually sure give me the rockets/missiles that were an development along side the AK-47 and you can have it just put on a raincoat for the splatter of various bodily fluids sent flying
Well, Fedorov Avtomat is a WW1 development and was nowhere to be seen after Winter War.
Fedorov MG is a 1920s single prototype.
How are they better than Tsar Tank from WW1 or interwar Vickers Independent?
the Czar tank cant even move it got stuck in the ground was abandoned and scrapped, Vickers independent is a multi turret tank all of which proved to be failures
Both Federovs were abandoned not because they were failure but too expensive and ahead of there time to be mass issued
in the game things like cost and logistics do not exist, simply put federovs could work in the world of Enlisted while your tanks would be expensive lawn furniture and a large target
It doesent matter man its in WT so we might see it some time soon
2 Likes
and chinese tank are also in warthunder so maybe someday china might became a thing (a HUGE maybe)
2 Likes
That’s not a jet, it’s a rocket
Its weird to see the guy that demands DF removes Stalingrad from BR3-5 ask for AK-47, is this opposite day?
3 Likes
Still better than Hori, and about the same as T-34-100, what’s the difference?
So like T-34-100
So same as RD/AS/T20?
Just curious why we can’t have AK-47 “early” or Tsar Tank, while Tiger 2 in Stalingrad and Fedorov Avtomat/MG are ok?
They are literally the same – one is too early, the other too late.
First off, no AK 47. It’s a post WW2 weapon. Out of the question
Second, I think some of you are completely misunderstanding. I too would like this game to be more historical, however my historical philosophy is different than others. Some people want 201% HA, me I am more reasonable. I don’t care if there are prototypes or this or that. I feel the only thing that matters is that everything lines up chronologically. I don’t care if you’re using this crazy 1945 experimental gun, just as long as I don’t see it in 1944 Normandy. Yes that means I feel the KV 2 and AVS should be in Moscow and Stalingrad because it fits the timeline.
However I know that at the moment this game will not restructured like my historical idea. Personally I always like to hope maybe one day. Or even as a separate mode.
Nonetheless at the very least we should keep everything restricted to the WW2 period. As long as we keep it WW2 then we are fine. If there’s some early AK 47 prototype made during WW2 then sure cool add it, but the AK 47 itself is a post war gun
2 Likes
There was none but there are tons of soviets ARs that were made during 44-45
3 Likes
the historical accuracy circlejerk on the forums will never stop, will it
1 Like
we quit when those who want call of enlisted do
Unfortunately No
Well I’m against the whole concept of historical accuracy favouring instead historical authenticity. And I would rather it be forgotten weapons of WW2 the game than “call of enlisted”.
Lol. Yeah cos soviets need more br 5 stuff that wasnt used
2 Likes
I say no to an AK 47 … IIRC it didnt start development until Late 1945 (after the war would have ended).
You have the AS 44 that does that role fine. Personally, I would rather the full auto everywhere go away … keep those weapons to assaulter and machine gunners. Semi Auto and maybe Burst can be everywhere.
1 Like
This topic is obvious flame war bait, I wonder why it haven’t disappeared yet.
5 Likes
Fierce discussions have become an incentive for war, oh, arrogant administrators still seem unwilling to listen to the opinions of players.You have to know that it is people who play games, not thegame who play players.