Sorry, but the armor is still sloped. Even without a sloping the armor has about 100+ mm thickness, while Panzer IV J or H can penetrate at max 98 mm of armor.
âŚ
That was my entire point. lol
If you had actually read the context. I was trying to prove that the penetration values in Enlisted are different than the ones in War thunder. The German PzGr 39 has a max penetration of 145 in War Thunder and would have penned the Jumbo in my given example, but since its penetration is weaker in Enlisted, it can not. It was exactly what I was expecting to see to prove my point.
Sorry, but you should read the context of a post before contributing lol
Indeed, these tanks are way off across the board.
Like the AB41⌠it overheats after 6 rounds⌠canât get a full clip off, but in war thunder, no overheating. They diverged a lot from WT models and it would be great to see all the pen values and etc. idk what the rationale is for the divergence
1 Like
Have you played Enlisted? The damage models perform nothing like War Thunder. The Panther canât pen the UFP or turret cheeks of a T-34. Thatâs just one of many examples. The tanks donât perform anything like they should, so using WT as a reference is pointless.
Whatever the reason, itâs not a good one. The tank damage model in Enlisted is by far the worst part of the game.
1 Like
I always aim for the turret ring for t34s, works in Warthunder, works in enlisted. No reason to aim anywhere else unless they present a side shot or you have a massive gun that doesnât give a crap.
The point is, even if the weapons dont have the same penetration StatsâŚthe weakspots, the crew and the ammo are still in the same place as Warthunder.
agreed, canât think of any legit excuse for it
The reason is game balance.
You canât have tanks massively out performing the tanks available to the other team. Even if they were historically superior. This is not War Thunder where they have hundreds of tanks to rank in suitable match ups. They only have a few dozen tanks to work with and find a game balance around.
I am perfectly fine with the mechanics and stats being different from War Thunderâs. I just wish they would tell us what the new stats are.
Except the advertisment speaks for something else.
" Thatâs why the accurately recreated ground vehicles and aircraft look, move and are controlled in the most realistic way and their damage model is quite sophisticated"
âDuring work on the vehicles in the game, development used their experience with the military online simulator War Thunder.â
Nothing implies that the went like âhey lets nerf tank and plane speed by ridicilous extreme and give them bascially same buggy and unrealistic values as old War Thunder system from 2017 or even earlier and ridiculous overhat meachnis for MG because BaLaNcEâ.
They still do. Moscow Soviets were constantly trolling German tanks because of their buggy sloppy armor and nerfed German shells to the point where they needed to give them time travel F2 to make some people play Moscow Axis again and Normandy Allies was mostly ghost town since Panther and definetly since the Tiger and Soviets also dont like that their IS shells keep bouncing off for no reasons and the M13 still trolls the Japanese. Not to to mention weird new HE mechanics.
Working as intendend I guess
1 Like
Letâs hope it wonât be necesarry after we get equipment MM.
Well. I still would like to use lights like lights and not like T1 tanks.
1 Like