So what are you comparing that 64 to?
All maps all BRs is right. It was ridiculous in the first place to split up maps when BR is just equipment rating. Iâve had such fun Tunisia battles.
At best map preference is the next step forward
except most weapons are not from that year.
gold order weapons being at br II surpasses TT ones that were there.
so i am âaccusingâ you for sticking with a false narrative.
again, the is a fundamental issue with the premise of your matter.
itâs subjective.
not objective.
you are trying to argue that it shouldnât go there just because of the sake of your immersion.
best we can come up objectively on why certain MISSIONS ( note, not map ) shouldnât be used for high br.
but again, that would just limit ( theoretically ) some missions.
not entire campaigns.
because both historical accuracy and " muh immersion " goes out of the window due to waging no real impact.
this game is not being played for those factors unlike some wants everyone else to know.
adding it up to the ones on the world wide it got.
now, i would have to translate to see any fellow russian player disagreeing and adding that count.
but to be fair, the forum alone isnât the main " decision factor ", apparently they ( allegedly ) take feedback from reddit, instagram and facebook as well.
but yeah, from the look of it, it seems most are positives.
or like me ( believe it or not ) indifferent to the mission pool changes.
i had fun larping with my tiger h1 both in tunisia and moscow ( even though those werenât there, for what i know it could be any generic random soviet town. )
but i wouldnât cry if those gets removed from the high br pool.
i just find disingenuous most of these " points ".
1 Like
Iâm talking about the majority of whatâs used there, not what veterans use. Most players use the iconic TT weapons.
Never mind. The snail will do its job anyway.
no⌠most players use what makes their experience easier to gain most amount of kills and experience.
because most of low br was still pretty much a world fantasy with everyone and their aunts using panzer III Ns ( mind you, a 1942 variant ) or T50s, being very rare vehicles.
or pumas ( 1943/44 ), m3a1 ( which werenât used at all in tunisia, and very rare in normandy )
or even ppsh42s ( while being kinda rare due to never have been deployed in moscow nor stalingrad )
but you get the point.
Not really if we go for TT BR2 SMGs for example.
Germany
MP38: Issued
MP40: Issued
MP28: Issued (Although mostly pre-1941)
MP34(o): Issued (Although mostly SS and security forces)
MP3008: No (1945)
PPSh41 Obrez: No (No evidence that it ever existed excluding in the Balkan Wars)
4/6
Italy
FNAB: No (1943)
OVP: No (Never)
Beretta M1918: No (Never)
Beretta M1: No (Protype with next to no information)
Beretta M38: Issued
Beretta M38/42: Issued (Albeit no information that it made it to North Africa)
2/6
= 6/12 = 1/2
About a half of Axis SMGs do not make sense in âtimelineâ and would be worse if we look at campaigns.
Why should we compare two posts from some random non-news-like thread made by some random? Was it even linked by an official?
2 Likes
Well, I generally see MP40s in the hands of German players. Although I have to admit that PPS in moscow is wrong.
Well, they havenât even bothered to conduct an official poll.
And in comparison, you have to compare two statistics, as the name suggests, âcomparisonâ.
So maybe we should take statistics on which weapons are used most in the game? Unfortunately, I donât have enough time today, but when I have enough time, I will extract approximate statistics by watching some replay and examining them.
Well, you can compare the likes of the new thread to the nos in the stupid âpollâ but you didnât like that either.
iâm sorry, but that doesnât cut it.
because again, your initial claim was about the tt weapons. which funnily enough, i didnât even considered the italian ones, but yes, as @CaptainSebekel proved, most are either anachronistic, or straight up never existed.
yet you can play them.
but, you then shifted your goal post into " thatâs not what people use " which sure, not many players uses italians weapons to begin with.
but it doesnât change that around the same br there are weapons that do not and will never fit " immersion / historical accuracy " ( which one being subjective, and the other objective ).
after all:
anyway, good evening or day.
1 Like
I was talking about things that are used, few people use weapons like the OVP. And I still think that the majority of the weapons there are historical, including rifles andâŚ
You too.
Translate? And either way itâs definitely not overwhelming negative.
So we got the English and Russian forum. What about the other tongues?
think that you failed math⌠this only shows that it is 50-50 or equal split. to be exact it is 55:54 
certainly mosin nagant m44, fedorov m1912, pps42, pps43, m1 bazooka, panzerfaust 60, yak-3, La-5FN, Yak-7B saw extensive use in moscow. and i havent even gone into GO and other factions.
if we are going by that standard, then majority of equipment up to BR5 is historical for moscowâŚ
immersion is subjective and depends on knowledge of history. cause your knowledge is crap, you think that current BR1-BR3 is âmostlyâ historical, but it simply isnt. there are many stuff that is simply either late war or was never used in war.
1 Like
Itâs not like your post are deep inside the comments. Your post are literally at the top.
Someone below already show the news in Russian section has more like than it.
Moreover you need to know that people will be more active if they hate something.
They will more likely to find opportunity to express their dissatisfaction.
While the one that agree it might not bother to open random topic about it by a random guy.