In terms of gameplay it’s a disaster, I believe some of the maps are too open even for BR3.
yes, some of them are.
but the " map " rotation ( which it’s more of a mission rotation ) can solve that.
and keep quarry for example, out.
The majority probably didn’t even see my message, there’s definitely a big difference.
And this may also be interesting to you, the majority in the Russian community in a single census opposes this change:
And a statistic from the Russian forum:
Its very much is, one game a Russian t34-100 was spawn camping our tanks and another t34 was in a house killing us off. I was quite unfun.
1 Like
So you agree that some of the maps in Moscow are bad for br5.
and in Tunisia everything is broken. So why did this change happen in the first place? We don’t need to make a big change for one or two maps.
Once a KT tank and a Panther were camped together (in Moscow) and the team had no planes, we were getting killed before we could get the tanks or ATs into good position. They easily won the game. It was very frustrating.
foundamentally, yes.
on top of my head, only quarry, perhaps mainsky forest and fortified district mission are a bit of a nightmare against jets mostly due to the layout.
the rest are fine.
as it goes for tunisia, only the market city part and al har can really be played without constant explosions.
but, more missions isn’t inherently the problem.
as said, we can take " bad ones " out of the rotation for higher br.
sure new maps.
but apparently the jets and camouflages with that nova thrower and the other few weapons took all the manpower.
Sorry to hear that, it must-have sucked
1 Like
Dunno, also applies to many Berlin and Stalingrad maps. And Normandy is known for the high ground maps.
We should value the opinion of one single country filled with tumblr-weirdos as much as the rest of the entire world population/ the international forum.
And btw.
So there goes that…
I think the benefit of this is not much in the end.
The number of suitable maps is small, and many of them need a lot of changes. Many maps are not changeable at all (like quarry).
We completely destroy historical accuracy for a few maps, I know you want to say that we don’t have a focus on historical accuracy either, but this destroys everything, most of the weapons in BR2 were actually used there, Thompsons, MP40, Grand, Kar98, etc. are weapons that are usually used in low br in Tunisia, in Moscow we generally have Kar 98, MP40, Mosin, etc. and most of the weapons are historical. But in BR5 almost everything is from 1944 and 1945.
lol
1 Like
Well, this is not a comparison.
No, we should instead compare something where you win I guess.
Read my text carefully. I know some of the weapons there are wrong (like VG 1-5), but the majority of the weapons there are historical.
To compare, you need two statistics. How old are you? 6?
if there are more missions to play, there are concrete benefits.
otherwise not much has changed.
and truth be told, most of the times map aren’t inherently the issue.
but jets, and the ability to shoot through wooden houses with tanks / tanks camping overlooking spawns are.
with the exception of the missions named earlier. those are part of a layout issue.
but some rock and terraform might solve it.
not the first time, and most likely neither the last.
right… yet another HA lunatic advocate…
is this historical accuracy in a room with you in this moment ?
it’s not me saying it.
although, yes, it appears i have to say it.
but this game IS NOT historical accurate, and NEVER WILL.
most of br 2 weapons are not around the same time period either.
pumas were made in 1943 and only used in 1944.
volksturm weapons are mostly from 1945 and many other vehicles are either anachronistic, or after said battles.
you’d be the first one to complain regarding balance. because HA is not a balanced matter.
also wrong.
mg 34s, 42s, thompsosons, ppsh41s etc were also present in those early war campaigns 1940-1942.
so not a valid argument either.
cherry picking your own argument is hardly objective.
nor really made much sense as again, enlisted never has been historical.
and believe me, i played since the alpha back in 2020 and keept playing up until now.
as much i love historical accuracy as well, you just gotta give it up and realize / accept the fact that this game is not. mods however, can satisfy that.
but no.
instead of asking for better improvements we keep engaging in futile threads trying to change the inevitable.
2 Likes
well, that’s quite damning.
that means half of the world wide community & the most of the russian community wants more maps for high br as well.
I used “almost” in my sentences, pay attention to them and don’t accuse me.
And my problem is that feeling, I’m not a fan of historical accuracy. But when I tried it for the first time, I was really blown away. It was a BR5 battle in Moscow. I killed enemies using AT44s with my STG44 and shot an IS2 1944 with my Panzerschreck. But in low br most of the weapons used are historical, so I have that general sense of immersion.