I’m currently sitting at a 64.04% win percentage. I know in some games where that would be considered a great win rate, but I’m really new to this game (still trying to get my K/D evened out after the first 30 rounds or so learning the maps) and I’m honestly just not sure what people in the community consider “good.”
Where does 64% stack up?
(For context, I just ranked up to Lt. Colonel last night)
Win rate means nothing as deserting makes the match not count.
So in theory you can achieve 100% WR by quitting matches you know you will loose.
True, though is the only thing matter in this game aside from the grind
Other game like BF I don’t care about WR but KD, here, just WR because K/D means nothing when you can farm bots
I haven’t deserted any games.
I only ever had one where I didn’t complete the round due to bandwidth.
not paying attention to it at all and just having fun. why do zoomers constantly need some “metric” to measure if they are enjoying a game or not? lol
As some others have said, win rate means nothing as it’s easily manipulatable (at least for now) through many avenues.
Many stats that aren’t measured should be measured, and I’d quite like to see stats per weapon, per weapon class, per soldier as well, engineer structures and how many of each, etc. They would help give more insight into a player and how they play the game.
But to actually answer your question, anything over 60% I see makes a competent player. But of course it’s not an exact science - if that person is only playing Tunisia Axis alone, then their win rate might be 15% right now and would by no means tell the full story of how good such a player is.
…when did I say that this had bearing on whether or not I was enjoying the game? I just was curious where this stacks up. I’ve been playing since August 5(just checked the timestamp) and took quite a few Ls at the beginning while I learned the maps, controls, etc, etc, etc. I also learned that I really don’t like flametroopers.
I’d like to see metrics and medals tracked by soldier.
This game have large matchmaking holes, and you can easy catch “wave” with matches only VS bots, with very high win rates.
So, for now, those numbers, like win rate or kill\death rate, cannot show anything.
Have fun in this game? That’s rich, I stopped having fun in this game and treat it like a second job due its MOFO, just wait for the merge change, if the change is bad, I drop the game and move to other game I like such as Battlebit Remastered, you know is incredible what a 3 man dev team can achive for a 15 buck game vs this unstable game that frustrate me with every new bug it brings with every update
I think it depends on whether you are a solo player, or if you play in stacks (with friends).
-People who play with friends will have much higher win rates, than those who play alone.
-While playing alone, you will consistently be teamed up with new players, a.i. controlled squads, or matched up against stacks.
-While playing with friends, you’ll consistently have teammates who are competent and know what they are doing (teamwork and voice communication).
-Your win-rate is also influenced by which faction and campaign you’re working on progressing. Where some campaigns are more populated with human players, while others are frequently barren or one-sided.
For myself, I’m a solo player, and my overall win-rate is 62%.
Playing on allies in Normandy, my winrate is like 79% while Axis is only 56%. Allies in Moscow is about 74% and Axis is about 64%. Allies in Tunisia is around 78%, while axis is about 60%, etc.
I am solo player mainly though
I only play with friends if they want to or when I have a cursed booster
hey 64.04 is a nice %, as long as you having fun. that side value its mostly for personal reasons. like to see if one is getting better or not over time / over certain amount of battles.
as for me…
i have bn playing since alpha times (2020) i used to play alot alone before,
i right now have 5600 battles with around 83.94% win rate.
You can check it all here:
Note that i do leave battles, winning or loosing ones and i rarely play conquest and most times i skip train map . 
(personal preference x)))
Win rates are one of the stupiest stats here, along with KD and ranks.
So people actually care about win rate? Lol
I made this quite some time ago. I dont really care about stat comparing to other people (not in enlisted anyway because you can doctor the shit out of it)…But I would like stat collection as a form of attachment to my Troops, squads and weapons and eventually a way to achieve unique skins or accolades.
This is not important, because it largely depends on when you play the game.After all, it is almost impossible to lose in the absence of enemy players.
Sorry to go off topic but…
Does anyone else have persistent green on their CHANGE NICKNAME DECORATOR?
(I noticed it in XxNELSONSHxX pics above.)
I’ve been trying to get rid of it for months…as it’s a smidge annoying.
I didn’t really want to complain tho…unless other peeps are afflicted???
(And yes, I’ve opened the decorators and clicked on them all a dozen times. :^)
HELP! BUG?
I’d like to have this (rather important?) NOTIFICATION working correctly! :^)
Cheers.
a 20% win rate on a one sided dead campaign against full teams is great.
90% win rate on a one sided dead campaign against AI is nothing special.
Normandy is 50/50 though, unlike Tunisia, Moscow, Pacific and current Berlin(used to be 50/50)
