i like playing as br 1 esp for bolty battlepass task
1 Like
I-II
II-III
III-IV (from IV perspective)
IV-V
And then there’s III-V which is a ±2 no matter ho you look at it, but no V’s are complaining about slaughtering III’s as seal clubbers gonna seal club
SO
I
II
IV
And V via inconsequential, occasional -2
Meanwhile, III is the only one with +2, but is also -1 or +1. Randomly. Based on player number. Very enjoyable. Very fun. Go have fun in your “consistent monotonous” BR’s
except it’s pretty much
I
II-III
III-IV-V
no Vs are complaining?
literally entire threads on a daily noticing players with low br equipment. both on the ally and enemy side.
it doesn’t matter if you don’t find it a problem, or have no problem with it,
it doesn’t mean there are no actual problems what so ever.
more like the opposite.
if you want to uptier your self… just place a br IV / V gun?
1 Like
We understand where you are comming from - diverse gameplay and such, but I believe BR3 being the wild card is a rather unpopular opinion.
Where’s the fun in that? Then I know what’s in store for me regardless
I guess you can’t really, tho like robihr already said, we already have a system that makes new players have a couple of “bot game matches” where they get to learn the game, this could simply be optimised.
I am.
I don’t want to dogfight lame p38 or starter Yaks when I’m in a G10 or K4. I want to face La7 and Tempests for example.
Seal clubbers have no say, here. +/-1 is the way to go…
Before a perfect Utopian +/-0.
1 Like
You don’t like the drag car plane?
You speak of the Focke series? eheh I still use them, just because they are somewhat legendary.
They’re bad at CAS… BECAUSE of the drift car problem devs just don’t (and won’t) bother to fix.
No. The P-38 Lightning. One of the fastest planes of the war
Oh, it’s fine… at lower br. At br 5 it’s a target.
Well, everyone should already know my stance on the soft rule, including Dark Force “IF” they are even paying attention to their players concerns. In a nutshell, if I choose to play my level 3 allies, I am not choosing them to play a level 5 Japanese unit, if I wanted that, I would have chosen my level 5 allies full of T-20’s, not M1 Garands. 
Some people are fine with it, most are not and like I have said before, those who are fine being uptiered two levels can simply add ONE level 5 weapon and boom, instant challenge and a level 5 match. Those who don’t want it HAVE NO CHOICE, other then not play level 3 Allies all together. I do still at times play level 3 Allies, but I have just made it a personal rule that if I get level 5 Japanese, I DESERT! Am I the only one who does this? I highly doubt it, so in the end, what did DF accomplish with their soft rule? Most likely just annoyed a certain amount of the player base who like playing level 3 Allies.
Dark Force is going to do what they are going to do, despite what the majority of the player base calls for, which IMOP is not the best business sense, but that seems to be a pattern with DF from my observation. So, I’ll continue to play mostly Germans. Other then crappy team mates and even crappier BOTS, I don’t have to worry about anything else other then just playing.
1 Like
Help X
Gain a sense of superiority by slaughtering enemy novices O
There are plenty of veterans that play lower BR levels. At least I’m giving the newer players on my team a fighting chance against them instead of just coming to the forums to bitterly call people “idiots”, “parasites”, and “anti-intellectuals” to give myself a sense of superiority… 
1 Like
Crazy attitude this guy has wow
Teaching new players that playing with a group is great is in no way shameful. Stop being ridiculous.
1 Like
Another possibility
People who would say this are not belittling others to gain a sense of superiority. They are because they have been watching the repeated crying and smears in the game environment and forums for 3 to 4 years, and they are completely disappointed with the environment such as the operators who have begun to avoid problems and the main group of war criminals who like to make excuses.
I used to be a person who respected others and spoke politely most of the time.
But after spending some time in this game and forums, I found that some people are really not suitable for being polite.
If you have any doubts about my opinion, please answer the two questions I always ask.
What (correct name) should I use to describe these suicide infantrymen who only use their brains a little when making excuses and spreading rumors? So as not to make me look like I am showing my sense of self-superiority.
If the above-mentioned groups can irresponsibly poison the environment and teammates,
Why do operators always destroy the gaming environment and other people’s gaming fun in order to protect these obviously harmful groups?
Is this fair to the rest of the player base?
Even your classification mechanism is a piece of shit.
Are you guys really paying attention to gameplay balance?
Or do you just decide based on what content on the forum is most likely to cause a fool to have a mental breakdown?
this is a kind of irony
The winning rate of a level 2 player depends on the number of enemy rookies or idiots and the number of level 3 normal players.
You can see in many past articles that new players were slaughtered by level 2 veterans and level 2 players cried because of level 3 equipment.
I always like to use the view that level 2 players are slaughtering new players to satirize the view that level 3 players are slaughtering level 2 players.
What is better than a comparison of the same type to satirize some low-skilled groups who like to make excuses?
I don’t quite understand your point, isn’t this always the case in multiplayer games?
You’re right
But when someone chooses to ignore this fact and starts making excuses I will bring it up and laugh at them.
1 Like