This is the list of features i expect to get in 2023 regarding the Enlisted Base game:
More voice lines for the soldiers
More explained here:
More maps
We need more maps for the campaigns.
It gets reaaaally boring playing the same maps over and over and over again.
it feels way too repetitive
Some ideas for maps are:
The outskirts of Berlin fighting your way from conventional houses or through factories (not seelow hights)
for example:
-crashing planes causing a crator + large explosion damage to anyone nearby
special features for campaigns
The current campaigns dont feel special because they all share mostly the same features.
it would be way better to add unique features to each campaign so they all feel special in their own way
!!this list will expand overtime!!
If gaijin wants to keep its playerbase (me included) they rather change/add some of those things
i expect way more crucial changes, i mean keofox himself said that this game is starting to live, i mean those are big words! I expect them introducing mechanics that will make this game a game i came here for. Better squad commanding, larger scale battles, more tactical approach than this cqc bombing nightmare. Less chaos but decent action same time. and finally, that they will do something about this splitting playerbase thing.
You are going to have to wait a bit for Okinawa and Iwo Jima, the devs seem to want to do Pacific in chronological order, so Bougainville, the Marshal Islands and Guam will likely come first. I really would like to play on a Shuri Castle map though, that would be great.
Although it will be fictional, I would like to see a battle on the Japanese mainland (Operation Downfall). Ironically, that would be realistic, since there are quite a few guns on the level list that are actually rarely used.
The fortified Boso Peninsula, the burnt-out downtown of Tokyo, the battle in front of the Diet building in Kasumigaseki where dozing lawmakers also happen.
I have imagined that campaign, but if Operation Downfall is implemented, it will be an end-of-the-world spectacle.
All urban areas will be reduced to rubble by relentless air strikes and atomic bombs dropped from time to time. The Allied soldiers are forced to wade through countless burnt bodies and corpses of civilians killed by poison gas, but there are “death pockets” of poison gas and radioactive material everywhere in TOKYO. If gas masks are not carried and worn properly when passing through the death pockets, American soldiers will also die. The Japanese will then mobilize the entire population and launch a reckless suicide attack in an attempt to kill as many American soldiers as possible.
As the American soldiers turn around amid the clattering of their Geiger counters, women, children, and wounded soldiers wrapped in bandages rush toward them with bamboo spears. The U.S. soldier can score points by shooting and killing them, but this will randomly cause the soldier to go insane, become incapacitated, or commit suicide.
So we have established that the two weapons are sufficiently similar that being hit by a bullet would have the same outcome.
If the Garand bullet hit the fuel tanks, it might not necessarily penetrate the thick metal wall of the cylinder. But if it did punch a hole through it, the most likely result would just be fuel leaking out.
"Since there is no ignition event, there would be no explosion.
Although a bullet might be very hot for a few moments after it is fired (due to the friction and the explosion that propelled it in the first place), its temperature would be far too low to ignite anything.
And in the very unlikely event of the bullet causing a spark as it ruptured the metallic fuel tank, that the spark might not be sufficient to reach the spontaneous ignition point of gasoline which is just over 530 Degrees Fahrenheit (which is around 80 Degrees Fahrenheit higher than paper).
Of course, if the weapon did by chance explode, it would do so with devastating effect, especially if the tanks were full of gasoline. The most likely outcome is that it would kill or seriously injure the flame-thrower operator.
But the real danger was from the nitrogen pressurized tank. Though nitrogen is non-combustible, if the tanks were penetrated it would explode much like an aerosol can.
The force of the explosion and the ensuing shrapnel could easily kill the operator of the flame-thrower.
Of course, the real game changer would be if our Garand-armed shooter was using armor-piercing incendiary rounds such as the .30-06 Springfield M14 cartridge."
"So the answer to the question is that it is possible but difficult to cause a flame-thrower to explode using small-arms fire unless you have a lot of luck or special ammunition."
Good job following up on the article ,and reading it through.
The information is interesting to learn more about. Definitely not what’s depicted in the movies.
The threads are known to veer off into random directions, and eventually have nothing to do with the OP.
(Can’t do much about it, except babysit your own post)
Which is why it’s important to make sure the Original Post has all the important information included together at the top. (Which you did).
The moderators/helpers/developers will read what you shared. Everything below, in the thread, is mostly just noise and opinions on things unrelated.
