airborne troops are also worthless. If we talk about the airborne troops, the USSR got them last. This is the only reason why the USSR airborne troops are what they are now, which is ironic, since the developers wanted to correct the German bias. I find this funny. The developers did not intend to release airborne troops equally for all factions, even when it was already clear about the merger/unification.
Yes, you are right, they gave me a bomb, I am not yet accustomed to the changes, I am writing something from memory.
Here is the context of 150mm guns. The funniest thing is that the Soviet shell has a higher flight speed, but lower armor penetration. For what reason is the shell better?
How so? Especially the universal soviet para squad is definitely part of the meta - since it can pick what ever meta gun it wants.
Also Paratroopers get extra vitality equal to body armor.
Sure it sucks that paras need to sacrifice their total ammo when they choose to spawn on the ground - but their ability to drop behind enemy lines → build quick rallies in the back → take out the enemies rallies from behind with little resistance → take out tanks that have no infantry support → apply pressure from the back…
just because Paras aren’t an instant win button when dropping directly into the objective anymore doesn’t mean paras are worthless - far from it, paras are the better guerillas, can build rallies and have AT weapons.
As long as they don’t have big ammo pouch by default like guerrilas, they will never be meta.
More with that toxic gimmick of having the only engineer in the useless mortar setup. And to top it off it goes to the second soldier in the order, not to a player. So there’s a pretty good chance he’ll die in the process.
And there are other disadvantages like being locked in long deployment, with possibility of your plane (now with mark = very easy to spot and shoot down) getting destroyed and you being dropped totally nowhere => putting you out of battle for even longer.
Paras are good only against passive teams that you don’t really need to use meta squads against.
Meta squads can be cycled without any disadvantages.
Well, the PPS-43 IMOP is over buffed, the Uragan is a level three smg impersonating as level two . The Soviets are the ONLY faction to have body armor, and the ONLY faction to have fully interchangeable weapons loadouts in its paratrooper squad. Is that bias, or just coincidental?
As far as Japanese swords in TT, I don’t see carrying a sword as much of an advantage or disadvantage, however the Japanese were issued more swords then other factions during ww2, and to be honest, the Sword I think is a traditional thing to the Japanese, NTM the Japanese would have literally nothing in the tech tree if this game were realistic.
Silencers, no advantage since silence in this game is not needed and they actually lower the damage hitting power of the weapon. You’re better off without the silencer IMOP. I don’t consider a Soviet 800 plus rate of fire smg an upgrade by adding a silencer and dropping the hit power from like 6.8 to 6.4, that just helps the Germans. I have the suppressed M3A1 Grease gun, and other then sounding weaker, it dropped the damage from 8.2 to 7.9, so not much of an advantage or Allied bias.
The bombs, take that up with the Dev’s as I know the Soviets used them and have no idea why they didn’t include them.
Lee-Enfield does not fight the Soviets, and the VG 2 both has significantly lower rate of fire and has to come out of ADS to bolt. Not even the best BR 2 bolt action for Germany, as the Mannlicher is much more comparable to the Winchester.
The BR III version (PPSh-41 box) has neither significant recoil NOR dispersion. In fact, it is the ONLY TT SMG in the ENTIRE GAME with such low dispersion. It is a laser beam at any range. If you can’t control that tiny little bit of visual recoil, that’s a skill issue.
WHAT? Not only does the VG 1-5 not EVER one shot even non-vitality users (even maxed out it does 9.6 dmg), but it also has nearly twice the dispersion of the SVT, and for some reason has the recoil control % debuff that comes with select fire rifles. The VG 1-5 is absolute trash.
Nope. A maxed out Fedorov does 13.9 dmg, which can and often does one shot through vitality. Also, once again, it has nearly HALF the dispersion of it’s German opponent (StG 44)
It’s beginning to sound like you just don’t play Enlisted. RD-44 is better than any LMG the Germans have in pretty much every single area. Less dispersion (especially when moving), less visual recoil, 5x better recoil control % than the MGs you mentioned (this is a ridiculous bit of Soviet bias btw), AND a much higher sprint speed factor.
You’re either delusional or just don’t play the game very much. Either way, those were some all-time garbage takes, and I’ve seen some real doozies on here.
They usually lack that second photo, for them it’s just the following: Spam the overpowered SMGs, Grey zone camp in the tanks, complain when Germany has a somewhat good thing, repeat.
. The Soviets are the ONLY faction to have body armor, and the ONLY faction to have fully interchangeable weapons loadouts in its paratrooper squad. Is that bias, or just coincidental?
I have the suppressed M3A1 Grease gun, and other then sounding weaker, it dropped the damage from 8.2 to 7.9, so not much of an advantage or Allied bias.
