Weapons and vehicles of the "Tigers of Burma" update

such information will only be availabe for when you’ll be ready to accept the game for what it is, and what it isn’t :wink:

as i have to repeat once again.

this game is not historical accurate, nor ever was, and most definitely, never will.

which it’s ironic because your self runs with non historical loadouts too in public matches.

so you can’t really complaing about the game, when you are actively part-taking in what you demonize.

had the " pleasure " of analyzing your loadouts.

your high br " HA " loadout

ill start by saying that you cannot decide br nor maps. that is much true,

however you did actively used:

italians in berlin:


and as far as i know, rarely italians paras were issued with german sidearms:


using a 4 man flametrooper squad with only g41s:

your 251/9 stummel crew is straight up fiction.

  1. german medics were not issued with finnish kps

  2. german drivers were never issued with zks

you overuse way too much g41s. which were quite rare. yet you have 3 squads with these weapons.

radiomen never used two weapons:

least volkssturm equipped:


needless to say, volkssturm rarely had 2 main weapons, tnts, mines, binos and side arms.
at best, a sidearm. but giving the benefit of enlisted limitation ( in the sense ,you are forced to use a primary ) at best, they should either be equipped with mps or kar98s. not both.

an additional kp spotted in what seems an assaulter squad with german converted ppsh:


( your logistical officer will have a field day )

and based on this match alone, i have no clue what your line up is even historically meant to be.

closest would be tunisia?
yet again, kps were not used in the battle of tunisia. nor the zks since were outdated/too expensive by then, and the german ppsh would have not been used either:

( grinding or not. that’s not very HA of you :wink: )

way to go, veekay.
way to go…

low br line up

second line, up, judging by your tank, i presume a stalingrad line up.

and you have a panzer III N,


which landed you in moscow. not your fault( though, could have decided not to use it. ), and all good so far.

a bit questionable the panzergrenadiers on your 251 having the gold order finnish mg, alongside mp35s. but we can let it slide.

however this “assaulter” squad

just… no.

the first assaulter is german, yet uses a beretta.

the machinegunner on the far is both using a second rear mg ( mg13) and an italian breda.
and the radioman is using a ww1 trench rifle ( the same you complained about it’s introduction ) while wielding a double rifle.

not to mention. all of your soldiers have sidearms ( pps too. which were very and i mean, very rare.):

you can’t make this up.

but yeah. keep preaching i guess.

or make pointless rants of how " this is not historical " or that, etc,
when you don’t even believe in what you say.

p.s
i’ll say this over and over again.
i do believe in HA. i’m probably the most who believes in hardcore HA PVEs. and guess what.
i do work towards making what i believe enlisted should have been through mods.

it takes time, no doubt.

but i don’t ask for the game to change when it never will ( nor should ).

5 Likes

I agree just ensuring german paratroopers can utilize a 100 round weapon like most nation especially Japan paratrooper loadout Tokyo arsenal should be replace with better weapon that thing ass well entire br loadout is ass

I stopped using the word historical altogether, everyone associates it with Veekay45 so I use authenticity instead.
I have nothing against him, but man I would love to see him suggest things that have a chance to be implemented.

3 Likes

such details ! nice comments. Accepting the game for what it is a fact but accepting for what It can become in a bad way it’s an other story. I’m mostly talking about Bp rework and some captured weapon

I believe something authentic with the squad formation and equipment, can be done if soldier squad squad like tank squad would follow an order

  • Officers
  • Second in command
  • Machingunner
  • Assistant Machingunner
  • Auto rifleman
  • Rifleman
    Etc…

So you have a good balance between full auto and semi/manual gun in the squad, keeping some firepower without making too much squad using Just Automatic weapons in high BR, the perfect balance

no.

there’s a general dumbness in this community.

you have lunatics such as veekay and my self, who wants historical accurate things.

but it will never work.
HA games do not tend to live long. and when you ask what one wants for historical accurate things, the definition often varys from individual to individual. so you can’t even please everyone.

which you can have historical things in your game just like non historical things either.

on the other coin of the medal, you have hard R individuals who bashes anything that has the word " historical " innit refusing to understand or see logic.

with that being said, both can coexist in order to have a future for this game.
imo, all of this " non historical " stuff can be beneficial for the health and lenght of the game overhaul. as it makes it arcady and accessible for most people.
although i do admit i’m not " rocking " with fgs given like candies, tiger 2h on stalingrad. but as i did, veekay should " let it go " as well. or make his own stuff through mods.

you can’t 2 years later, keep complaining about the same thing of how X never existed, or Y shouldn’t be in the game and yada yada yada. ( don’t get me wrong, you absolutely can. ) but to then do nothing about it or, in his case, not even do what he preaches for.

it’s just being an absolute :clown_face: at this point.

as i said, game variety and gameplay options are a good thing.
even if i primarily love pure hardcore missions.
like some of my mods are.

hell, to be honest here, what i envision most likely not even the 5% of the playerbase of enlisted would play it or even like. because it’s much more different than the base game.

which it’s fine. i stay in my lane though.

i do not think veekay is stupid.
but he sure is playing all of his cards to seem that way.

well of course. i do agree with most of the things he suggests.

it’s just he will not take no as an answer.
and keep going on futile fights that won’t change a damn thing.

i offered him multiple times to make an historical mission, and settings.
which what he asks, is quite easy to do.

he would be the mind, and i’d be his “arm” in making it a reality.

but in 2 years, he have yet to come with some sort of settings and maps for a total historical thing.

so i have started doing it my self.

3 Likes

So this is why you are so harsh on him, makes sense to me now.

Burma is fine, but when will we see Soviet-Japanese conflicts?

9 Likes

just before the game goes into maintenance mode?

It has 25mm angles plates on the front, you can literally check the game right now

1 Like

Whats the US heavy Tier 3 tank? Ik the KV-1 for the Soviets

Churchill probably. But it’s a premium and its not that good apparently, except that like KV it’s beast when downtiered and terrible when uptiered.

The Proto StGs are transfers from the other campaigns, this one is not. It doesn’t make sense to add outclassed weapons, so they don’t

You must have missunderstood me, I was weighing in on the guy chritizing you over the Federov Avtomat, and added that he has previously agreed that Soviets should be without captured panzerfausts because they got enough airpower.

1 Like

That’s the way I see it. For the future of Enlisted it was inevitable that all factions need to have an equal counterpart to their opponent’s weaponry, we got to accept that. Bashing the game’s lack historical accuracy with these decisions is beating a dead horse, and that ship has long sailed. There’s no turning back. I still would like to see Stalingrad reserved for our current BR I-III weaponry and that’d be perfect. But there’s no point going mental for it. There’s always mods for that.

I’m seeing this as what could be Enlisted’s most important update thus far, after the merge. But most comments I’ve read are complaints from GE mains, which makes me question their sanity. Or if they should take a break from this game all together and find a healthier hobby. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of them are apologists either, based on some of the unhinged takes I’ve read both in YouTube and in the forums, it’s just not healthy rooting so hard for a faction like they do, it goes in borderline fanatism at times. They also have this sort of spoiled kid syndrome or something, just constant whinning and they’re never satisfied with what they get, everything is “Wah wah… Gimme this! Gimme that!”. But that’s for another topic altogether.

This update has brought things that were asked for YEARS. Now devs could just focus on fixing more bugs, more customization (like APCs for example). More maps, and filling in the gaps of Japan’s tech three, which is still Enlisted’s “baby” faction. As they’re still quite recent and were just an afterthought in the game’s development, and thus their TT is lacking many things like heavy mortars and AT in high tier, high tier sniper rifle, etc. Unlike USSR and Germany, who have the best all around TTs in the entire game right now. With the US finally catching up now with the Super Pershing.

5 Likes

Not that guy, but your nagging is insufferable

you’ll get used to :wink:

I really hope I don’t

There were some screenshots regarding a Soviets versus Japanese event in one of the past test servers. I wonder what has become of that. :thinking:

1 Like

On Dave