Some fixes already was made for Hyde atleast)
6 Likes
can we get some info about the fix pls 
I guess it will probably get more inline with STG. But then, why not just use a rifleman equipped with an M2 Carbine.
I’m not saying that Hyde must be OP, but at least it seemed different.
ohh insteresting, can we see the new stats please?
1 Like
Loadout of all paratroopers need to be upgraded they feel super weak or contain weapons you would never use.
US already got T20, IDK why M2 Carbine shouldn’t be moved to Assaulter class? Its characteristic doesn’t fit to the current roles rn. If concern it gonna overlapped with Hyde, Hyde doesn’t have bayonet from what I see so someone might prefer M2 Carbine over it.
1 Like
So just use M2C, what’s stopping you?
But it definitely shouldn’t be reclassified to AR. There’s no need for it. It is still closer to SF Rifle than to AR.
when it will be ready
1 Like
Just from my feeling where it should belong lol and I hope its model getting fix too, the bolt is cycling back clipped through the receiver is kinda oof.
So, test server?
1 Like
Is the test server gonna last for 3 or 5 days?
Hopefully soon ™
1 Like
It would be a huge nerf for M2C. It can now be used by basically any class of soldier. And you want to enforce that only one particular class of soldier can use it - assaulters.
That would screw over a lot of players who own more than 4 of these weapons.
No, the M2C and G43k should remain classified as SF rifles.
4 Likes
Actually, One thing I like about M2C is that I generally equipped the 5th soldier in the squad with it because they will not sit outside of the center of the screen in hangar menu like when they equipped with T20 lol Kinda wired picky but it really bugged me when soldier’s poses aren’t in the center point.
Thanks for the heads up mate. Appreciate it.
Don’t worry I will be there with my question about pre order just like I promise (cause I was dumb and I didn’t thought of it when they announced it)
When will info on Chi Ri 2 and Rocket Pershing being"WW2 " tanks be ready?
One was never even built, and the other supposedly tested after the war?
Why can Japanese engineers still build German anti-tank guns?
1 Like
Its a place holder until Japan gets new guns.
such information will only be availabe for when you’ll be ready to accept the game for what it is, and what it isn’t 
as i have to repeat once again.
this game is not historical accurate, nor ever was, and most definitely, never will.
which it’s ironic because your self runs with non historical loadouts too in public matches.
so you can’t really complaing about the game, when you are actively part-taking in what you demonize.
had the " pleasure " of analyzing your loadouts.
your high br " HA " loadout
ill start by saying that you cannot decide br nor maps. that is much true,
however you did actively used:
italians in berlin:
and as far as i know, rarely italians paras were issued with german sidearms:
using a 4 man flametrooper squad with only g41s:
your 251/9 stummel crew is straight up fiction.
-
german medics were not issued with finnish kps
-
german drivers were never issued with zks
you overuse way too much g41s. which were quite rare. yet you have 3 squads with these weapons.
radiomen never used two weapons:
least volkssturm equipped:
needless to say, volkssturm rarely had 2 main weapons, tnts, mines, binos and side arms.
at best, a sidearm. but giving the benefit of enlisted limitation ( in the sense ,you are forced to use a primary ) at best, they should either be equipped with mps or kar98s. not both.
an additional kp spotted in what seems an assaulter squad with german converted ppsh:
( your logistical officer will have a field day )
and based on this match alone, i have no clue what your line up is even historically meant to be.
closest would be tunisia?
yet again, kps were not used in the battle of tunisia. nor the zks since were outdated/too expensive by then, and the german ppsh would have not been used either:
( grinding or not. that’s not very HA of you )
way to go, veekay.
way to go…
low br line up
second line, up, judging by your tank, i presume a stalingrad line up.
and you have a panzer III N,
which landed you in moscow. not your fault( though, could have decided not to use it. ), and all good so far.
a bit questionable the panzergrenadiers on your 251 having the gold order finnish mg, alongside mp35s. but we can let it slide.
however this “assaulter” squad
just… no.
the first assaulter is german, yet uses a beretta.
the machinegunner on the far is both using a second rear mg ( mg13) and an italian breda.
and the radioman is using a ww1 trench rifle ( the same you complained about it’s introduction ) while wielding a double rifle.
not to mention. all of your soldiers have sidearms ( pps too. which were very and i mean, very rare.):
you can’t make this up.
but yeah. keep preaching i guess.
or make pointless rants of how " this is not historical " or that, etc,
when you don’t even believe in what you say.
p.s
i’ll say this over and over again.
i do believe in HA. i’m probably the most who believes in hardcore HA PVEs. and guess what.
i do work towards making what i believe enlisted should have been through mods.
it takes time, no doubt.
but i don’t ask for the game to change when it never will ( nor should ).
5 Likes