Weapons and vehicles of the "Tigers of Burma" update

Hey we gotta feed the sweat lords

Since AAs can no longer overheat, neither should SPAAs.

I really don’t understand why something that has to be reloaded after every 7 shots is forced to have an overheat. It effectively has double the cooldown.
For what?
To balance significantly reduced dmg against infantry?
It’s such an incredibly unnecessary mechanic that certainly doesn’t improve gameplay. It just makes it more annoying.

3 Likes

Well it’s one thing to say “hey here is a prototype that was maybe in ww2” and confidently claiming “Rocket Pershing was tested after the war, but built before, trust me bro” and then going silent.

Sounds a lot like “I don’t have any proofs to back up my claim” situation.

Thanks for the analysis I guess but I believe in none of my messages over the 4 years I’ve said anything other than:

So I really never cared/claimed to adhere to something being issued to someone in particular.

But if you notice any fake guns in my loadouts – I’ll be happy to learn something new!
I’m definitely not a know-it-all expert on every weapon there is.

At the very least I can assure you that you won’t see me use these because I’m not even gonna unlock/buy them:

image

image
image

image
(Fedorov was for the squad only)

Same with the upcoming Hyde and other fortnine level stuff.

So good luck spotting those I guess :wink:

3 Likes

i can confidently claim that most parts of that rocket pershing were built during the war. :rofl:

2 Likes

i never claimed you used any these.

and believe it or not. i did mentioned it that you wouldn’t use those which at least shows some integrity. ( yet… i didn’t typed that out… effe me i left it out on accident when i was reorganizing pictures. and since i can’t prove it even though i’m 100% honest all the time and even more than i should, " you got me ". ).

i was more referring the fact that you preach about HA here and there, ( through out many years ) and your loadouts aren’t that historical.

( which i should have specified, and goes without sayting, neither are mine. i mean, for the most part they are, but some of them that i’m using lately, aren’t. aka full fg para squad, kriegshoff stg ( guilty pleasure of mine )

our looks very alike :smirk:



except for the type hei and the ho-ri ( which i bought to personally test how they performed as i didn’t believed some people’s claim. ).

fun fact, i don’t even use them.

because this is my current fun line up:







Well see this

Around 30 or so suggestions that can all be implemented if DF wasn’t lazy.

What a snowflake behavior.

You keep complaining about the same thing.
For years.
Literally since I’ve been active on this forum, you’ve been spamming the same dogma over and over again.

And with your intelligence, you know that hardly anything is going to change. Because I truly doubt you are that naive. The developers have clearly decided what path they’re going to take.

Yet you insist on spamming the same thing over and over again. I bet it’s no longer for the purpose of trying to change anything.
But only with the intent of trashing something that other people like and enjoy.
You’re just doing it with ill intent and it’s quite obvious. The term “butthurt” fits it perfectly.

2 Likes

Me too.

I actually came to like Veekay complaining about historical accuracy. Its one of the few consistant factor in this world of uncertainty.

2 Likes

image

bahahaha mine looks exactly the same

1 Like

Cheers!

It will never be not funny seeing CMs/helpers disappear into shadows when asked to provide a single picture of Chi Ri 2 / Ho Ri for example ever existing in real life but continue answering other fanboy comments :joy:

2 Likes

i blame WT for this because even WoT calls it the correct name of “chi-ri” and WT’s version is just a normal chi-ri which did exist Chi Ri & Chi To Aberdeen Tank Scrapping and was sadly scrapped as you can see a glimpse of in the video near the end of the tank showcase

1 Like

Variety…

1 Like

Mg42 1500 ran/min(25ran/s)

and how long have you been playing for the USSR? A year ago, two years ago? If you personally just like the fedorov, I’m not going to convince you otherwise, do what you like.

depends on how fast that MG42 can reload or how well the dispersion is, it might be a nice tool for BR5 Germany.

That being said, it was time the Yanks finally get some tank that can have a fair chance against German armor. Jagdtiger tho? 250 mm of armor is kinda crazy, why not add Elefant? that one at least has some weakspots

3 Likes

again I don’t have say that I liked only fedorov, it as an little different playstyle unlike AS and AT-44 wich is interesting. So what how many years do i need to play URSS for talking about them in a forum ?

only the reload should change as we already have 1 with the 50 ammomag with the same stats otherwise it’s a big joke

use to play br3, if pick any would drop japan, the trouble is pic any with br3 gear means br 3-5🤣no just no

Great germans now have d... So they can f… Themselves.
If history serves me right the mg 42 had mobile 50,100 rounds ,and stationary,100,200,500,1000.
Also the firing rate was faster then they can make the ammo,some 2000_3000 rpm,problem was overheating on guns without cooling system.

And my overall remark is germans got their most famous weapon,and the allies get everything they can draw.Super fair.
Give us more air support,russians extra people in the game,not kalasnjikovs. At this rate what next a t-72 or 84 agains a jagdtiger?