I always found it odd that the Johnson LMG puts a 25% sprint reduction on a soldier even though it weighs significantly less (5.9kg) than the other LMG’s with the same reduction. The same goes for the premium Colt monitor which has the same weight and decrease. The W.A.R. however, gives a 20% decrease even though it weighs 7.25kg.
There are more peculiar inconsistencies. The Soviet SMG PP Shpitalniy 1940, which comes in at 5.3kg, gives a 20% decrease to sprint speed even though the LAD with the 150 round magazine and 7.63kg has no sprint spread reduction whatsoever. The RD-44 which comes in at 7.4kg has a 20% sprint speed reduction.
It would be fair for the Johnson LMG and Colt Monitor to modify their sprint speed reduction to 15% or at least 20% to bring it line with the others.
Soviet bias doesn’t exist. It’s all just wehraboo whining.
Even if stats say russians have advantage, axis has king tiger and that explains everything.
Well to be fair Tiger II H is indeed OP - as it should be realistically speaking, however I have been complaining about that since day one of it being announced.
Stats matter, cuz if they wouldn’t, just give FG42 20 dmg, since … you know, it kills ( apparently ) with one shot anyways, what could possibly go wrong?
There are certain balance logics and rules so to speak that exist for a reason, Soviet gear however is constantly performing on this thin line of breaking the rules without being noticed.