In the PvP game we’re not meant to have any form of damage reduction to begin with but by letting it exist it makes these Gray zones so we can have these lovely conversations
Clearly you were talking about the LAD. You only said it 3 times there ha. I just didn’t understand your point. You said germany only gets 4 conders meanwhile russia gets 4 LADs as if it’s unfair to germany?
Again, it wouldn’t bother me so much, it would just seem silly to me though and probably piss the historical guys off.
1 Like
So there’s a problem with Germany having 4 100-round machine guns to run around with, and we look at the Soviets having 4 150-round machine guns falling from the sky, yeah, that seems about right.
1 Like
You shouldn’t be talking about such things when that ship sailed a long time ago
Beretta M38A and 38/42 both have the same fire rate, is very accurate, has nice sights, and are in tech tree. Yes the m38a only has 20 rounds but they are bringing the 38/42 down to br2 which has larger mag. Can also list off a few event/premmy guns with similar rof that feel good. Mas38 being one of them
No, I don’t think there’s a problem there. Do you? Conders has waaaay higher fire rate. I’ll take the conders over LAD anyday regardless of it having 50 less rounds
Make sense from the ground perspective but not when you can equip it to paratroopers or the fact that you can also give them suppressed weapons and that seems to be only a luxury for the Soviets.
And don’t say Germany has FG launcher which was nerfed into the ground or the fact that we have the Italians which was nerfed to the ground too
Yeah it really was nerfed into the ground by giving them extra ammo
Good insights as usual from you
11 Likes
I just realized, for the sake of consistency you should probably also lower the Type Hei Rifle (Late) from BR IV to BR III. The Type Hei 10 rifle is very marginally worse (slower reload) and is at BR III while the Type 4 Rifle is going to be far better than both and be at BR III.
1 Like
Yeah and what about the grenade launcher which is attached to it are we supposed to put that in the bin and if I wanted a regular FG to give to my German paratroopers I could have just given them that instead of going with this instead.
So you’d want a worse weapon?
You do realize that the grenade launcher fg has less recoil than a fg 42 II right ?
5 Likes
Forgot to add another point
7. Unarmored TT APCs, explosive packs, mines
->BR1 (available to new players)
Reasoning: why on earth should BR1 be crippled
3 Likes
At this point I don’t think I really care it’s better than having that piece of junk strapped to it so at least I can feel like I have something instead of something that was nerfed to the ground
38/42 is as bad as any other BR2 German smg, low rof, bad recoil/little bit better dispersion, bad visual recoil that is even worse than mp40, it’s an objectively mediocre weapon that can’t compete against power creeping crap that US/USSR/JP been receiving for past few months. We need Beretta M38A (40 rounds) at BR2 with a bit buff to the recoil/dispersion
Definitely not, it’s got cucked by Gaijin in usual German hating fashion - less dmg, worse recoil/dispersion, worse muzzle velocity. Yes it’s much better than mp40 but nowhere near as good as M1A1 Thompson, PPS-42/43 or new completely overpowered Uragan that just laughs at Mas-38 or 2A smg. And all of those are free guns so i paid for nothing. But at least model looks and sounds cool.
4 Likes
Don’t forget about body armor spitting in your face as well
4 Likes
Everyone keeps forgetting that, especially Soviet mains
1 Like
They can’t help it when they’re drunk most of the time and any competitive player for them left this game a long time ago and same goes to the allies so that’s why we’re stuck in this nonsense.
Because any form of competition is a problem for them and if anyone bought that thing we got scammed.
And you’ve also got to keep in mind we’re talking about the players from Moscow and Tunisia when anything was a problem for them.
1 Like