That’s not because of the power of their gear but dedicated masochistic players that despite garbage weapons (dark souls level handicap) can still win against you with overbuffed guns
2 Likes
Thought you were talking about br3 smgs not 2. Yes it’s dumb they are dropping the m1a1 down to 2, at the end of day though germany will still win a ton of matches
Germany will continue to dominate despite the Soviet/USA buffs only because German teams are far more likely to build rally points than the Soviets or US. (In my personal experience)
We are as stubborn as cockroaches but that is still no excuse to overpower creep the Soviets and the allies because they lack a spine
Which is why nobody uses it.
So all you look at is iron sight and mag size? Explains a lot.
Wow. So much reason. The shity US carbine is also the sole of its Smith and Weston or however its called. Best GO ever.
You mean that thing that is a sidegrade M3A1 in terms of states? Wonderful gun, nobody uses it beyond maybe Assault Engineers most people probably dont even know or use.
And now totally pointless but I dont see you complain that T20E1 buyers got their feelings hurt.
0.64 isnt really accurate. The MP34 does about the same. And so is 630 rof not really special. Only the silencer is cool, but I sont see you praising the shitty Commando Carbine for that either.
1-2 is not significant.
Which is why nobody uses it.
LAD is basically a PPSH which replaces two magazines for one so not really impressive. And only the Cönders apply here.
Kv1 isn’t all that. Pretty sure almost any br 3 german tank can easily kill it. Dark flow has increasingly gotten rid of assymetrical balance but it’s still there to some extent. Russia is known for their smgs during the war, germany known for their tanks and u.s. for their airpower.
Because Germany never produced good planes during the war or good firearms.
Or the US for their tanks or Russia for early war tanks (despite their mechanical flaws).
I guess that is why nobody copied Soviet weapon design beyond the SVT but the MP40.
The ppsh doesn’t have the ability to fire nearly as long without reloading. The LAD has an advantage in the mag department.
Do I really have to describe to the T where the advantages of the weapons lie? Dang dude, really thought you could piece this together on your own
If the Soviets are known for their machine guns why do their machine guns defy all logic and the Germans are known for their tanks why are our tanks getting broken left and right and not being indestructible and if the Americans are known for the air why are their rockets so buggy that they go through everything.
1 Like
The PPSh also does not need ammo bag to reload.
No I got. They either do 1 more damage or a sidegrade MP34 with a silencer or a weapon that suffered the same fate as the BSA but for some reason you didnt complain that people got hurt.
It is significant. It’s the difference between a 2 hit kill and a 1 hit kill. Again, i thought you were a veteran here and knew better
Question to Soviet/American/Japanese mains:
Find me a single German smg of BR2 that have same power, accuracy and reliability with clear sights as PPS-42 or 2A or even that have similar dmg per bullet with great rof of M1A1 Thompson. I’m waiting.
2A smg is like a cheat gun and playing on creative mode.
4 Likes
Terrible suggestion.
3 Likes
Pointless if you knew as vet that people use vitaly and body armor on Soviet side.
How nice before the merge the Soviets were very limited in the lads but with the merge now they can have four of them while we only have 4 condors while they get to have 4 lads
1 Like
Oh wow you care about that type of stuff then what you have to say about body armor which defies even more logic
Please keep your discussion civil u can give your opinons and discussion but there’s no need for sending insults.
5 Likes
I did not see anyone insulting anyone here and we’re just asking someone some questions when they ask something which is quite strange and we want some logical answers to the madness or do we just conveniently forget what numbers mean
I have no idea what you just said here lol.
I’m on the fence about it, it doesn’t really bother me that much, but yes i can understand why people complain about it. From a historical side you could argue for it, from a balance side you could argue against it. At the end of the day, russians wearing body armor doesn’t affect my games all that much. Still getting 100 kill games, still winning matches. The only time body armor really plays a significant role is if both parties shoot at each other at the exact same time with comparable guns. Which is very seldom. Otherwise he or you would of died anyways regardless of body armor.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like