“BR 3 hell”
Lol remember, BR 3 will no longer fight 5.
4 Likes
this does not necessarily need to be the case - it will now one hit down true, but in the end its a weapon for assaulters, and those are technically limited compared to trooper SFR, so the idea itself isnt bad at all, all I wish for is that FG42 woulnd be treated like a cursed gun that needs two shots to down vs Soviet armor - it really should get a damage buff to match AVT and T20
it completely invalidates premium and gold order/event thompsons
What a short sighted change, but to be expected after they put p2w Thompson 7.63 on sale for BR2.
12 Likes
Another inputs:
Honi 1: BR 1 (No MG, No Turret, Open Chassis)
Honi 3: BR 2 (No MG, No Turret)
Nato: BR 2 ( (No MG, No Turret, Open Chassis)
For Hori, both prototype & production (but especially prototype) can be downtiered to BR 4. They don’t have MG, Turrets, & good mobility (reverse speed to get away/disengage) & their good frontal armor & gun doesn’t save them from AT infantry and bomber planes
Update for USSR:
T-28: BR 1 or update its useless shrapnel shell to better APHE shell
I think KV 2 & IS 2 need buff too, they have very low DPS, but for clarification I don’t have the experience using it.
For USA TD, I don’t have the experience but With very poor armor & open chassis nature, M10 can be BR 2 and M18 can be BR 3.
For explanation, open chassis mean the vehicles is very vulnerable to high explosive weapon, heavy machine gun, molotov, & Infantry small arms ambush
Any comment whether it is justified to be in the game at all? @MajorMcDonalds
I mean, we have “Sniper M1 Garand as well”
Why not?
Content won’t be deleted anyways
5 Likes
its a two hit kill gun, despite its high damage it will still only kill with two shots just like 9mm guns, the extra damage will mostly only mean that it suffers less from damage drop - which isnt all that crazy considering 45 ACP is kinda difficult to aim with at longer ranges because the bullet flies pretty slow.
Then why pretty much same gun but with just 20 rounds exist?
3 Likes
except for patches on uniforms for some reason…
but for the rest, i agree.
The M1C was made during ww2.
even though it wasn’t used, like many more examples within enlisted.
3 Likes
M1C should stay that’s a end of WW2 Gun, the M1D in-game Sniper M1 Garand should go though that’s the post War one. I seriously wondered long time what is the fck up with these two.
well well, its still ongoing isnt it? these things can still change ofc. but the overall reduction of a Thompson to BR2 is a good thing I think.
what it does is effectively make US players get an iconic gun in low BR matches.
Tho I have to agree that maybe less SMG power would be wiser for BR2 instead.
500 RPM 9mm vs 600 RPM 45 ACP is then in favour to the US weapons by DPS.
M1C and D were made end of WW2 though only M1C used, I’ve seen pictures in-field M1Cs at the very last of WW2. the D version could go since wasn’t issued till after War over…
But on other hand I mean It could have been sent out last months IF they would have wanted too or speed up the process, you know by a stretch why not…
2 Likes
I mean a TT BR2 Thompson was kinda needed, however what they have done here just wasnt it, not to mention Im against the idea of premiums needed to make historical or meta lineups, premiums should be good but unique alternatives to what is in the tree, not flat upgrades.
i suppose it will just be a variant and “might” be useless since everyone got their panzer 4 j,much better(ofc for legacy players).
soviet bias pls underestand small indie dev
2 Likes
I guess this was my fault yet again…
I just made a post that this isnt a true at all.
7 Likes
When high br AAs for Jets
4 Likes
A downed soldier is beaten and almost dead … yes finishing them off is obviously also part of the game, but who ever downs first wins the fight - this is immensely more important.
1 Like