Hello, I would like to propose some changes and improvements to the game. Tunisia campaign should be available for 4BR (some weapons from 4BR are iconic for North African battles) there is no Tiger tank in Tunisia ;(
I hope that my feedback will be helpful:)
Soviet mains would solved this by making the tank BR3 XD
Good suggestion, many weapons that are in Br IV (and even BR V) saw wide-spread service in NA. Not just the Tiger, but the MG 42 as well, and the Allies should have access to the Thompsons there as well (and likely lots of other things I’m not thinking of as I am writing this). The old campaign system is gone, but the BR limmit on map selection should be reconsidered.
Agreed. I have made this suggestion several times. All campaign maps should be put in the map pool for all battle ratings.
People concerned about historical accuracy need to realize there are a hundred things about Enlisted that are not historically accurate such as the double standard for WW2 insignia and symbols (or lack of WW2 insignia/symbols on Germans specifically).
Tunisia and Moscow have great maps and playing them at high BR’s would give them a different dynamic. Automatic rifles may be of less use at the very long ranges, so you may have some people adding a sniper squad or equipping some troops with bolt actions at BR4/5 instead of just giving everyone FG42s, AVT40s and T20s.
Gameplay and variety should take precedence over inconsistently implemented attempts at historical accuracy.
All maps, all BRs!
I disagree with this, not because of the historical argument, but because of the map design, imagine KT and p47 in Tunisia, the infantry has no chance of survival.
Of course if they add a preferred map system the problem will be solved. I simply uncheck Tunisia when I play BR5.
You would rarely see tigers even if it was br 4. People prefer to use panthers since most of the time they are better and they are unlocked earlier. I havent seen any tiger h1s in high br but panthers appear every match
With the current BR system (which I dislike) I am against having Tiger in Africa.
In general, I am against any situations where adding 1 historical item adds even more ahistorical ones.
For example, did Me 262 exist? Yes.
Should it be added but only if Soviet post war Su-9 is also added? Hell no.
Or Battle of Kursk. Were there Panthers and Tigers? Yes.
Does it mean it should be BR1-4 with T-34/85 and IS-1 which didn’t even exist back then? Hell no.
Similarly, Tiger in Africa. Was it there? Yes.
What does adding Tiger (BR4) mean? Panther, Sherman 76mm, Calliope, Jagdpanzer, etc - which was never there.
So unfortunately with the current system it’s not worth it.
Sometimes less is more.
Yes, people don’t like them, but I love Tiger 1s, I use the Tiger H1 whenever I’m BR4, I even always use Tiger E in BR5:
Tunisia needs tigerh1 and Tiger E, but not sure about tiger 2
