I was trying out the Hyde M1944 Carbine in the test server. This weapon needs some serious improvements namely:
The sights. They are absolutely horrendous as shown by @NonNational.
I understand that the developers wanted to implement the sights on this weapon as present in this original picture.
However, there is a need to take some creative liberty as done by CoD Vanguard. Here the M1944 Hyde Carbine is known as the Cooper Carbine.
As you can clearly see the ring is not there on the iron sights and it looks so much cleaner in-game.
It is not comfortable at all to use at range unlike the STG-44. At present it feels more like an overglorified Thompson .30 cal SMG at best. By looking at the hidden stats of the M1944 Hyde Carbine it looks like the horizontal recoil should be reduced even further.
(Zoom in for better clarity)
I would request @James_Grove@MajorMcDonalds to kindly pass on this information to the developers. This gun âseriouslyâ needs to get these fixes if it is live up to its name. Thank you.
Look alright to me. Definitely not the worst the game has seen
No, no, no, no, no, no.
NO
Terrible precedent. Terrible idea. If I wanted CoD, Iâd play CoD. No thank you, Iâm good. I like my guns being as close to HA as possible, thanks. I even advocate for a full stat overhaul because I think more realistic guns, or at least some fricking basic logic when it comes to their stats, would be more fun
You are missing the mark entirely. Itâs not about historical accuracy but field modification. As highlighted by some people on the Enlisted sub-Reedit the ring could easily be taken of for ease of usage. I used CoD Vanguard as an example. But some art studios have also implemented the open sight as well.
Well now weâve moved from the absolute abomination that is Vanguard into theoreticals of theoreticals. I donât think the sight is that bad. Definitely still useable withoutâŚâquestionableâ design choices
I completely disagree.
Drop the fire rate to 650ish to drop the recoil and dispersion.
It amazes me that the allies get an assault rifle when they never used one in ww2.
If the allies never had an assault rifle how can you give them one better that a Stg 44?
Dont say game balance because germany can only get the condors for cqc and only four of them.
Which is no longer an option anyway.
This Hyde 1944 never went past the prototype stage.
Please give us german prototypes like the Tiger 2 H 10.5 and the Panther 2.
Its only fair.
I would second that motion. The only Allied SMG that I think would be close would be the UD42, but then again, itâs a premium squad and the amount you can have is limited to that. I think the hitting power is quite a bit less then the Kiraly as well, 6.8 vs. 7.9.
Oh god not another one of YOU people like seriously you act like the Hyde gonna break your STG gun which the STG is literally perfect I cant with you people thinking this weapon gets a little fix itâs gonna be the best weapon oh man itâs gonna break the game oh man
The most important thing is to maintain consistency.
Honestly, current sight models are too casual. Seem to depend entirely on the mood of the outsourced personnel.
Just like thisâ
Great just add the Maus and E100 just to show how ridiculous this is.
The kiraly has a slightly better fire rate to the 50 round thompson but has a smaller magazine size.
The ppsh box is better than both at br3 which you dont have to engage.
Where are the german captured weapons?
Kv1 75?
All effort is made to address the allies hell they even get the mg 42 as well.
I mean same can be said for the AVT-40 5 rounds less but has better stats but still but no yeah I mean first Kiraly shouldnât be in BR5 it should be BR4 but it wouldnât make much of a difference
If im not mistaken the sight is flippable at least by the looks of it they can flip it down and let the notch just stay the one in Vanguard is completely wrong
