Why not?
It will be as m1 carbine in Normandy.
1612 year, when in Russia was āsmutaā(no tsar + polish king use one traitor how tsarevich Dmitry(who was son of Ivan 4, but was killed when he was a kid)).
Communist give 300k soldiers only to liberate Warsaw.Maybe for full Poland more.So it your savers.
(Sorry for off-topic)
FG must be nerfed with avs/avt.
i disregard that opinion.
fg42 avs avt what ever shall stay the same but, limited to a type of soldier like current machine guns are to gunners. The weapons should stay powerfull, but more limited.
m2 sights should have a clear picture and should be limited too. running 7/9 man with m2 carbine , even if its painfull, its broken.
vg1-5, should be like the m1 carbine in normandy . a weapon that can be equiped on multiple soldier classes.
100% this.
One of the running suggestions in another thread and something I helped support was an Automatic Rifleman type trooper. Have it be something that is just automatically allowed on certain squads. Limited to say 3 for Rifleman Squads, 2 for AT, Engineers and Flametroopers. Sniper no, MG no, Assaulter no.
Throughout all the posts and everything Iāve seen here it is one of the two feasible solutions Iāve seen on the forum.
Also, really want the VG to be trooper specific so I can have them en masse and then wait for the VG OP threads.
I mean under nerf - limit by class.
FG/AVS/M2 etc must be limited by paratrooper squad(but it only my opinion).
Exaclyā¦ Makes absolutely no sence to have vg1-5 as an assaulter only weapon.
No sence.
to add onto this, all automatic rifles shouldnāt get the movement dispersion debuff that actual MGs get as well
i agree shortly after i was playing and i found that gun and i grabbed it i went to the ammo supplier and i was WTF the vg 1-5 was a semi auto rifle not an assault rifle per se it looks like the carbine m1 before the nerf but this weapon should be available both for raiders but especially for riflemen since it is a semi-automatic weapon.
the sad part here, is that it was indeed a weapon avaiable to other troopers in pre-alpha berlinā¦
i dont know what was the thinking behind to make it an assault weapon only, and i dont know who or why anyone would ever take one over a smg ingame.
why would a player choose a vg1-5 on a assaulter over: mp3008, mk36/III , erma EMP 1944, baretta m38 40 rounds, mp40 , mp35/I ?
makes absolutly no sence to have it as a assaulter only weapon, and in normandy for example, the m1 Carbine is avaiable to most troopsā¦
makes no sence!
on the other hand, we can carry fg42ās /fg42/II like retards on every soldier possible, but this less powerfull weapon, we cantā¦ a weapon designed for volkssturm troopers as last ditchā¦
makes the feel of the batle in berlin kinda dull,
we already have the 30 round g43 kurz to some extend avaiable on that campaign (atleast 2 can be used same squad or diferent one if we intend to use it twice in a row in lone fighters.)
fires the same round, but have 3 round burst, can be equiped on troopers.
makes,
absolutly
no
senceā¦
Absolutely Agree, itās Volkssturm Gewehr, it was damn widespreaded for use of all.
yep i know. Tbh i was really surprised when i saw that the 1-5 was an assaulter gun. It would make sense lets say if it was full-auto. But as a semi should be an all troops weapon. Apart from that, it would be way more immersive to have full squads with it in Berlin. Like come on DF
imagine if you can put the VG1-5 and the VG2 in every single class, that would be very epic
what more one would needā¦
maybe the kriegsmodel kar98k scoped from alpha ā¦
but that one wont apear ever again i m afraidā¦
Personally i would even exchange the FG-42 for the VG1-5. Sure the later is worse but i prefer diversity in campaign
oh come one why they put the normal scoped kar instead of this. kinda sad
i def would.
vg1-5 was (besides STG) my favorite alpha gun.
i only used it a couple times in current state coz its simply not worth to play with it over an SMG.
i tried it too, but just felt like handicapping myself using it over an SMG