I personally think that this is the most needed vehicles that DF should focus on adding in the next update (well Japan can have more then 1 but if its only 1 vehicle being added this one will be best):
Well Germany has everything but it will be good at BR III it has something with some armor so Jagdpanzer 38(t) will be good addition.
2.Ki-43-II with 2 x 100 kg Army Type 94 GPHE bombs:
Well Japan really needs BR I fighter the most that can fix 3 BRs with its introduction its starts in the Air and will have 2 bombs. So from BR I to BR III this vehicle will be useful. It will be the most needed stopgap while more fighters are introduced.
3.IS-100:
Well USSR really struggles at BR V with this super long reload on that IS-2 so better add IS-100 it will be really appreciated. Thatâs really what the soviets need the most.
4.Spitfire F Mk IXc with 1 x 500 LB S.A.P. Mk.II bomb :
We need more vehicles like trucks, cars, HALFTRACKs (M3 Halftrack belongs in USA-UK tree for the 100th time), bulldozers, scout cars, very light armoured cars, etc.
I believe all or most squads should be mechanised. The APC squad can retain mobile rallypoint privilege.
BR I -II should be trucks, BR III-IV halftracks and BR V âkangaroosâ (to use the Allied term) being unarmed tank hulls converted to APCs.
Riders from BR II onwards need jeeps, kubelwagens etc. with one 1 machine gun.
Ill support the Spitfire idea because we need more UK tech generally. Mathilda, Cromwell and Valentine tanks for example.
You phrased it as if all Allied converted tanks are called that, as if it were a generic term for them all. Itâs a very specific term used by the Commonwealth and in particular Canada. It was used for a couple different chassis including Churchillâs, Priestâs, and Stuartâs
The US on the other hand used tank destroyers like the M18 and made the M39 out of it. As well as other projects such as the T13 and T33 both based on the Chaffee which were both canceled projects. These seem to have armored utility vehicle or cargo carrier designations
People know what I mean and thatâs all that matters. âArmoured Utility Vehicle, Kangaroo,
Other Name For Converted Unarmed Tank Hulls For Carrying Infantryâ should be added to the game.
Thatâs it. Itâs not that difficult LOL.
The POINT is that the original poster wants more heavy tanks and aircraft, I argue we should be getting more vehicles, such as trucks, cars and halftracks, instead of any more heavy tanks/aircraft
I would also like to add my own suggestion for a vehicle that Japan should get, and that would be the Chi-Se heavy tank. I know its a paper prototype tank, just like the Ho-Ri, but Japan is stuck at BR5 now and does not have any heavy tanks with a turret (Donât make me laugh with the Chi-Riâs 70mm something of armor at BR5). Such is the world Darkflow has stuck us in.
To explain the Chi-Se tank as simply as possible, it is a Ho-Ri tank that possesses a turret. It would give Japan something more similar to the heavy tanks of other nations.
I agree! They have no BR5 assaulter weapons, no BR5 attacker planes, no AT weapons above BR2, no tech tree 10 round semi auto for BR3, like what is up with that? Japan needs all of these things so they can have more parity with every other faction
